org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20051026/29870967/attachment.pgp>
file, and return it to the user.
--
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20051026/b0181004/attachment.pgp>
part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20051026/5dc283d1/attachment.pgp>
Is there an overview of the 0.7 routing architecture online somewhere?
I'm curious as to how it compares to previous routing schemes Freenet
has used.
Thanks!
Evan Daniel
IMHO the minimal installer (run default settings + configuration via
broswer) seems much more interesting, cross-platform, and it can also
be used to run Freenet on a remote machine without X server.
But my major concern is about Kaffe/Classpath compatibility and
I guess that a Java GUI would not
Proposal:
We abolish double slashes.
When a container is first accessed, it is fully unpacked into cache,
including its .metadata. If the container does not include a .metadata,
we generate one. This allows users to do, for example,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/freenet-20060718.tgz/lib/freenet-ext.jar witho
roject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
--
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: s
Is there an overview of the 0.7 routing architecture online somewhere?
I'm curious as to how it compares to previous routing schemes Freenet
has used.
Thanks!
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-b
Major simplification:
The search below is only necessary because we might want to access an
archive with no metadata. If we require that there is always a metadata
manifest, we can just look it up in the manifest, rather than in the
cache (with the uncertainty that produces). If we are going to do
It has been suggested on several occasions that // is ugly. Unix-derived
tools usually expect that // means /.
So, what if we use / ?:
Archive manifests and metadata manifests are required to be consistent.
Meaning no two files have the same name, and no directory has the same
name as any file. T
Well as far as compatibility goes, Classpath's graphical capabilities
have been rising at a very rapid rate recently. But you may be right
about minimal installer.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:08:21AM +0200, Emanuele Olivetti wrote:
> IMHO the minimal installer (run default settings + configuration
IMHO the minimal installer (run default settings + configuration via
broswer) seems much more interesting, cross-platform, and it can also
be used to run Freenet on a remote machine without X server.
But my major concern is about Kaffe/Classpath compatibility and
I guess that a Java GUI would not
12 matches
Mail list logo