and a Java >>href="http://freenetproject.org/papers/ccc/ccc-freenet-
> >>demo.tar.bz2">demo
> >>-(requires Java 1.5).
> >>
> >>___
> >>cvs mailing list
> >>cvs at freenetproject.org
> >>http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvs
> >>
> >
> >--
> >Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
> >Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
> >ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
> >___
> >Devl mailing list
> >Devl at freenetproject.org
> >http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin)
>
> iD8DBQFEToCMQtgxRWSmsqwRAqsbAJ4v/GUDzh8b8ooouCO5jdXwKfQgvwCfQq4r
> /1tFqstiDxXlUT7AtvGYDb0=
> =a+81
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> ___
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
--
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060425/6b55f1f0/attachment.pgp>
equires Java 1.5).
>
> ___
> cvs mailing list
> cvs at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvs
>
--
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060425/c9814347/attachment.pgp>
- Nothing is
> > impossible. Our Boss says
> > so.___ Tech mailing list
> > Tech at freenetproject.org
> > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
>
>
> ___
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
--
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060425/38cf56fb/attachment.pgp>
The link to the demo is borked, btw...
On 4/25/06, Ian Clarke wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> And in other ways it is more secure. I think a time will come when
> straddling both 0.5 and 0.7 will hurt us, and that time may be now.
> We can still link to the 0.5 stuff
The link to the demo is borked, btw...
On 4/25/06, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> And in other ways it is more secure. I think a time will come when
> straddling both 0.5 and 0.7 will hurt us, and that time may be now.
> We can still li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
And in other ways it is more secure. I think a time will come when
straddling both 0.5 and 0.7 will hurt us, and that time may be now.
We can still link to the 0.5 stuff, but we should be pushing new
users towards 0.7.
Ian.
On 25 Apr 2006,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
And in other ways it is more secure. I think a time will come when
straddling both 0.5 and 0.7 will hurt us, and that time may be now.
We can still link to the 0.5 stuff, but we should be pushing new
users towards 0.7.
Ian.
On 25 Apr 2006, at
We certainly should retain the option to get 0.5... 0.7 is still an
alpha and in some ways it is less secure than 0.5.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 01:03:20PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Well, perhaps a shorter version of it - that was a very long new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, perhaps a shorter version of it - that was a very long news
item - more of a self-contained press release.
I think it may be time to replace download.php with download-new.php.
Ian.
On 25 Apr 2006, at 12:45, Matthew Toseland wrote:
You s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, perhaps a shorter version of it - that was a very long news
item - more of a self-contained press release.
I think it may be time to replace download.php with download-new.php.
Ian.
On 25 Apr 2006, at 12:45, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> You su
You sure the 0.7 alpha notice should no longer be on the main page?
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:01:46PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: ian
> Date: 2006-04-25 19:01:45 + (Tue, 25 Apr 2006)
> New Revision: 8577
>
> Modified:
>trunk/website/pages/news.php
> Log:
> clean up news a b
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 01:12:00AM +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
> Is this actually load balancing ? It sounds more like load limiting.
Load limiting is FAR more important than load balancing, thank you for
correcting my errant terminology. However there is *some* need for load
balancing, to the extent
In late December Oskar and I gave a talk in Berlin about Freenet
0.7. The video of this has just been made available, you can grab
the torrent here (its big, about half a gig):
http://media.ccc.de/filez/congress/2005/lectures/video/mp4/22C3-
videos-incomplete-20050423-torrents/22C3-492-en
In late December Oskar and I gave a talk in Berlin about Freenet
0.7. The video of this has just been made available, you can grab
the torrent here (its big, about half a gig):
http://media.ccc.de/filez/congress/2005/lectures/video/mp4/22C3-
videos-incomplete-20050423-torrents/22C3-492-en
Is this actually load balancing ? It sounds more like load limiting.
Is there ever a situation where a message is forwarded to any but the
optimal (from purely routing perspective, without any account for load)
node ?
I'm asking because I just came to think about a really nasty interaction
betwee
15 matches
Mail list logo
