e: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20061219/e17b1d20/attachment.pgp>
're the same. But both are valid.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20061219/2bb02411/attachment.pgp>
>Ensure the location is in between 0.0 and 1.0 on PeerManager.distance()
> * Both parameters must be in [0.0, 1.0].
mustn't that be [0.0, 1.0[ ? i thought 0.0 is the same as 1.0?
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> - Does anyone have any idea how to proceed from here? Any theories? Any
> idea for intelligence gathering?
I have previously recommended that all nodes should drop their position
in favor of a random selection on a regular (actually random) basis.
That could help agai
- Voltaire
Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve
neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: node stats1.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 188532 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https:
ns system.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20061219/f4498491/attachment.pgp>
t --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20061219/73de67e1/attachment.pgp>
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> - VolodyA! V A at r0pa7z7JA1hAf2xtTt7AKLRe+yw - 2006.12.19 -
> 14:50:18GMT -
>
> I've finally got JAXB and Freenet Plugin system to work together, now i need
> to start actually coding.
>
> Sorry for making everybody wait. I have a hope that in 2 days (2006
A - B - C - D - E - [ A ... ]
A 0.0
B 0.2
C 0.4
D 0.6
E 0.8
Now connect F to D.
F initially has value 0.1 (randomly chosen).
F attempts a swap. It connects to B and they decide whether to swap.
B's side: I am 0.2, neighbours 0.0 and 0.2, distance product is 0.04.
If I swap, my distance product
called a 'Pedo', you're not radical.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20061219/87355303/attachment.pgp>
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:49:56AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 10:16:42PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> >Ensure the location is in between 0.0 and 1.0 on PeerManager.distance()
> >>=20
> >> > * Both parameters must be in [0.0, 1.0].
> >>=20
> >> mustn't th
>On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 10:16:42PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >Ensure the location is in between 0.0 and 1.0 on PeerManager.distance()
>>=20
>> > * Both parameters must be in [0.0, 1.0].
>>=20
>> mustn't that be [0.0, 1.0[ ? i thought 0.0 is the same as 1.0?
>They're the same. But bo
On 12/19/06, Oskar Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > - Does anyone have any idea how to proceed from here? Any theories? Any
> > idea for intelligence gathering?
>
> I have previously recommended that all nodes should drop their position
> in favor of a random sele
On 12/19/06, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > - Does anyone have any idea how to proceed from here? Any theories? Any
> > idea for intelligence gathering?
>
> I have previously recommended that all nodes should drop their position
> in favor of a random selection on a regular
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 10:16:42PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Ensure the location is in between 0.0 and 1.0 on PeerManager.distance()
>
> > * Both parameters must be in [0.0, 1.0].
>
> mustn't that be [0.0, 1.0[ ? i thought 0.0 is the same as 1.0?
They're the same. But both are vali
>Ensure the location is in between 0.0 and 1.0 on PeerManager.distance()
> * Both parameters must be in [0.0, 1.0].
mustn't that be [0.0, 1.0[ ? i thought 0.0 is the same as 1.0?
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetp
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> - Does anyone have any idea how to proceed from here? Any theories? Any
> idea for intelligence gathering?
I have previously recommended that all nodes should drop their position
in favor of a random selection on a regular (actually random) basis.
That could help agai
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 07:40:26PM +, Volodya wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >
> > I've finally got JAXB and Freenet Plugin system to work together, now i
> > need to start actually coding.
> >
> > Sorry for making everybody wait. I have a hope that in 2 days (2006Dec21) i
> > will actua
PROBEALL: requests (telnet to 2323 and type PROBEALL: then tail -f
wrapper.log), and implementation of spying on other nodes' swaps, seem
to confirm the prior observations that:
- Locations of nodes are strongly clustered around 0.0.
- PROBEALL: and short-term (with spying on peers) swap-based netw
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> - VolodyA! V [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2006.12.19 - 14:50:18GMT -
>
> I've finally got JAXB and Freenet Plugin system to work together, now i need
> to start actually coding.
>
> Sorry for making everybody wait. I have a hope that in 2 days (2006Dec21) i
> will a
- VolodyA! V [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2006.12.19 - 14:50:18GMT -
I've finally got JAXB and Freenet Plugin system to work together, now i need to
start actually coding.
Sorry for making everybody wait. I have a hope that in 2 days (2006Dec21) i
will actually have an alpha version out. Hop
21 matches
Mail list logo
