Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070306/4dcf322b/attachment.pgp>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070306/7c30cb54/attachment.pgp>
.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070306/73469430/attachment.pgp>
igital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070306/1ec7936a/attachment.pgp>
w to safely exchage refs", and the
> > > >>> solution "eliminate ref exchanging by implementing opennet"?!? Am I
> > > >>> the
> > > >>> only one to think that's very stupid?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ___
> > > >>> Devl mailing list
> > > >>> Devl at freenetproject.org
> > > >>> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
> > > >> ___
> > > >> Devl mailing list
> > > >> Devl at freenetproject.org
> > > >> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Devl mailing list
> > > > Devl at freenetproject.org
> > > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Devl mailing list
> > > Devl at freenetproject.org
> > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
> > >
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iD8DBQFF7Jt7A9rUluQ9pFARAr7gAJ9iJHAur3dIsrClY+AmFSQgOy6bXgCfY2Po
> > kqDOiGlYjY/lZ0v66rlsip0=
> > =NcEY
> > -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> >
> > ___
> > Devl mailing list
> > Devl at freenetproject.org
> > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
> >
>
>
> --
> Founder and CEO, Thoof Inc
> Email: ian at thoof.com
> Office: +1 512 485 1970
> Cell: +1 310 593 3724
> AIM: ian.clarke at mac.com
> Skype: sanity
> ___
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070306/07157e0a/attachment.pgp>
* Ed Tomlinson [2007-03-06 07:57:45]:
> Hi,
>
> Why not take the simple way? The last time I had to reset my node I ran
> a swapbot that used irc to get some refs. If I remember correctly there is
> a project that creates an anonymous irc network. Why not have nodes
> create or connect to thi
We are applying for Google Summer of Code 2007. The deadline is the 12th
of March. The main problem with this is that we need, before applying:
- An ideas page
- A list of mentors
- A few bits of text for an annoying form.
We need to submit before (on?) Monday; best to do it before that,
really. B
Freenet 0.7 build 1018 is now available. Your nodes should automatically
download the new update for you; please upgrade. If auto-update is not
working, please tell us.
There are very many changes in build 1018, far too many to list here,
but the main thing is that Fred's memory usage should be si
If I may suggest... In a password based connection establishment the
user has to interact with the node anyway (either to set or view the
password to convey it). As I understand it, an established node must
already have a working NAT hole with it's external address and port
known. So why n
MRogers posted the following on Frost:
http://wiki.freenetproject.org/NewPacketFormat
http://wiki.freenetproject.org/NewTransportLayer
Any feedback would be welcome. These are the new proposed formats for
the packet transport layer and the congestion control and retransmission
layer respectively.
* bbackde at googlemail.com [2007-03-06 11:35:17]:
> But my node updated to 1018???!!!
Ok, then it's probably a timing issue : could you please wait a bit more
Martin and get back to us if it hasn't updated before the end of the day
?
Thanks.
PS: my node hasn't detected the update yet either.
* Volodya [2007-03-06 05:44:35]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I don't understand why a password and IP address is easier than a
> > one-time reference. I suppose it has the advantage of being able to
> > write it down - but for it to be secure
But my node updated to 1018???!!!
On 3/6/07, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote:
> * Martin Scheffler [2007-03-06 07:12:48]:
>
> > does the updated code gets uploaded to freenet this time?
> > i had no luck updating the node by itself so far...
> >
> > good byte
>
> Toad hasn't announced the new
* Martin Scheffler [2007-03-06 07:12:48]:
> does the updated code gets uploaded to freenet this time?
> i had no luck updating the node by itself so far...
>
> good byte
Toad hasn't announced the new build yet: it's likely he hasn't inserted
it.
NextGen$
If I may suggest... In a password based connection establishment the
user has to interact with the node anyway (either to set or view the
password to convey it). As I understand it, an established node must
already have a working NAT hole with it's external address and port
known. So why n
You don't understand why:
43.213.43.1:54533:foriemdhs
...is easier than...
identity=MZHvIrRsHRLqqTaEN-S5lLpeD8yk572zFfPFxsCsS-M
location=0.16978598221719554
testnet=false
myName=SanityMBP
lastGoodVersion=Fred,0.7,1.0,1009
sig=1fd90af28fddd96d0b159c7bd93658f9267b84dbacef75bc400074258eabe81e,433ca
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:30:51AM +0100, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote:
> * Martin Scheffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-06 07:12:48]:
>
> > does the updated code gets uploaded to freenet this time?
> > i had no luck updating the node by itself so far...
> >
> > good byte
>
> Toad hasn't
Well, if you are exchanging electronically, you are probably able to
move the latter as easily as the former, no?
Sadly no, because of the [ insert favourite expletive ] NATs which kill
DCC. But you can move a small file with IM clients, surely? It's moving
a file and then double clicking on it or
Hi,
Why not take the simple way? The last time I had to reset my node I ran
a swapbot that used irc to get some refs. If I remember correctly there is
a project that creates an anonymous irc network. Why not have nodes
create or connect to this network, at least some of the time, and use a
stan
p-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070306/0c59cce4/attachment.pgp>
:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070306/ba84b248/attachment.pgp>
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070306/6af3d040/attachment.pgp>
You don't understand why:
43.213.43.1:54533:foriemdhs
...is easier than...
identity=MZHvIrRsHRLqqTaEN-S5lLpeD8yk572zFfPFxsCsS-M
location=0.16978598221719554
testnet=false
myName=SanityMBP
lastGoodVersion=Fred,0.7,1.0,1009
sig=1fd90af28fddd96d0b159c7bd93658f9267b84dbacef75bc400074258eabe81e,433ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Scheffler wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 6. M?rz 2007 06:44 schrieb Volodya:
>> One thing that might be done is not having an increadibly secure
>> password protection (just secure enough), but when somebody adds
>> themselves via password they get added
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I don't understand why a password and IP address is easier than a
> one-time reference. I suppose it has the advantage of being able to
> write it down - but for it to be secure it would need to be a one-time
> password; you'd
* Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-06 07:57:45]:
> Hi,
>
> Why not take the simple way? The last time I had to reset my node I ran
> a swapbot that used irc to get some refs. If I remember correctly there is
> a project that creates an anonymous irc network. Why not have nodes
> creat
Hi,
Why not take the simple way? The last time I had to reset my node I ran
a swapbot that used irc to get some refs. If I remember correctly there is
a project that creates an anonymous irc network. Why not have nodes
create or connect to this network, at least some of the time, and use a
stan
ext attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070306/1d7517cb/attachment.pgp>
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070306/e138bc5e/attachment.pgp>
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-06 11:35:17]:
> But my node updated to 1018???!!!
Ok, then it's probably a timing issue : could you please wait a bit more
Martin and get back to us if it hasn't updated before the end of the day
?
Thanks.
PS: my node hasn't detected the update ye
* Volodya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-06 05:44:35]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I don't understand why a password and IP address is easier than a
> > one-time reference. I suppose it has the advantage of being able to
> > write it down - but
But my node updated to 1018???!!!
On 3/6/07, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Martin Scheffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-06 07:12:48]:
>
> > does the updated code gets uploaded to freenet this time?
> > i had no luck updating the node by itself so far...
> >
> > good
* Martin Scheffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-06 07:12:48]:
> does the updated code gets uploaded to freenet this time?
> i had no luck updating the node by itself so far...
>
> good byte
Toad hasn't announced the new build yet: it's likely he hasn't inserted
it.
NextGen$
33 matches
Mail list logo
