Ian Clarke wrote:
> I can't seem to find a link to our subversion repository anywhere on
> the website. Unless I'm missing something, that is a rather critical
> oversight.
>
> Ian.
>
>
Hi,
at the end of Download page [ http://freenetproject.org/download.html
], there is the "Source Code" se
Nope, that isn't the repository URL, its just a link to a web
interface for viewing the repository. I can't give that to Subversion
and have it check out and commit to a repository.
The correct repository URL is:
https://emu.freenetproject.org/svn/
Ian.
On 8/6/07, Juiceman wrote:
> You need
* Matthew Toseland [2007-08-06 22:28:30]:
> FROM FROST:
>
> On Wednesday 01 August 2007 21:23, NextGen$ wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-26 20:01:34]:
> > > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > > > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > > > > I propose that darknet
it?
DoS on link crypto is not a big deal. You can only do it if you have the
noderef of the node you are DoSing, and if you do, you can do lots of other
fun things to them too (seize their node, kidnap them and render them unto
the interrogators...). I accept that there are lots of bugs
blem with freenets development. But it still doesn't make the
result any better.
Sorry for this rant but I do get frustrated over such things, given enough
time. :|
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070806/632a8c83/attachment.pgp>
way to get bad (newbie, slow, soon
to leave) peers, and it costs a lot of time.
>
> NextGen$
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070806/e59a4f9d/attachment.pgp>
rt --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070806/2659f8bd/attachment.pgp>
sc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070806/8173f534/attachment.pgp>
potential
> problems.
>
> Ian.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070806/6a290771/attachment.pgp>
Nope, that isn't the repository URL, its just a link to a web
interface for viewing the repository. I can't give that to Subversion
and have it check out and commit to a repository.
The correct repository URL is:
https://emu.freenetproject.org/svn/
Ian.
On 8/6/07, Juiceman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need to go under the "Developer" section. ;-)
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/
On 8/6/07, Ian Clarke wrote:
> I can't seem to find a link to our subversion repository anywhere on
> the website. Unless I'm missing something, that is a rather critical
> oversight.
>
>
I can't seem to find a link to our subversion repository anywhere on
the website. Unless I'm missing something, that is a rather critical
oversight.
Ian.
--
Founder and CEO, Thoof Inc
Email: ian at thoof.com
Office: +1 512 524 8934 x 100
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
AIM: ian.clarke at mac.com
Skype: s
You need to go under the "Developer" section. ;-)
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/
On 8/6/07, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't seem to find a link to our subversion repository anywhere on
> the website. Unless I'm missing something, that is a rather critic
I can't seem to find a link to our subversion repository anywhere on
the website. Unless I'm missing something, that is a rather critical
oversight.
Ian.
--
Founder and CEO, Thoof Inc
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: +1 512 524 8934 x 100
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
AIM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: sani
s this code?
Ian.
--
Founder and CEO, Thoof Inc
Email: ian at thoof.com
Office: +1 512 524 8934 x 100
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
AIM: ian.clarke at mac.com
Skype: sanity
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070806/3724beae/attachment.html>
* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-06 22:28:30]:
> FROM FROST:
>
> On Wednesday 01 August 2007 21:23, NextGen$ wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-26 20:01:34]:
> > > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Monday 06 August 2007 22:28, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> FROM FROST:
>
> On Wednesday 01 August 2007 21:23, NextGen$ wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-26 20:01:34]:
> > > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-0
FROM FROST:
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 21:23, NextGen$ wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-26 20:01:34]:
> > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > > > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 21:23, NextGen$ wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-26 20:01:34]:
> > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > > > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward annou
On Monday 06 August 2007 21:29, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On 8/6/07, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 06 August 2007 00:59, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > On 8/5/07, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Here at DEFCON it has been pointed out by the Gnunet guys that we are
> > >
On 8/6/07, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Monday 06 August 2007 00:59, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On 8/5/07, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Here at DEFCON it has been pointed out by the Gnunet guys that we are
> > > creating a node location by combining locations supplie
On Monday 06 August 2007 00:59, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On 8/5/07, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here at DEFCON it has been pointed out by the Gnunet guys that we are
> > creating a node location by combining locations supplied by two
> > different nodes by taking one to the power of the ot
New node locations are created using RandomSource.nextDouble(). It is evenly
distributed across [0.0,1.0]. So yes they were looking at A ^ B.
I'm skeptical about Oskar's proposed solution; it appears to me that it could
cause progressively more perverse clustering, but Oskar knows a good deal
m
23 matches
Mail list logo
