ned message part
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071125/a12bf277/attachment.pgp>
I was just implementing https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=1816
Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> * zothar at freenetproject.org [2007-11-22
> 15:54:29]:
>
>
>> Author: zothar
>> Date: 2007-11-22 15:54:29 + (Thu, 22 Nov 2007)
>> New Revision: 15923
>>
>> Modified:
>>trunk/freenet/sr
I was just implementing https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=1816
Florent Daignière wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-22 15:54:29]:
>
>
>> Author: zothar
>> Date: 2007-11-22 15:54:29 + (Thu, 22 Nov 2007)
>> New Revision: 15923
>>
>> Modified:
>>trunk/freen
Hi,
currently, the official public freenet repository is
svn://freenet.googlecode.com/svn, while the
sourceforge CVS repository is obsolete. I propose to
change the legacy build.xml file to reflect this
situation. The proposed new file and its diff to
r15948 are attached to this message.
Here is
-build.xml
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071125/7dd79649/attachment.xml>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: build.xml.sig
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: 352255175-build.xml.sig
URL:
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 01:46 +, Michael Rogers wrote:
> 35 characters of base32 (IP + port + 128-bit pubkey hash) is not
> remotely realistic? It's only four phone numbers! :-)
We could substitute words for every n-bit combination, making up funny
sentences, like:
"The tree" (0x1b) "sits" (0x
Is it
> obsolete?
Yes it is.
NextGen$
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071125/b56ceae2/attachment.pgp>
* Jack O'Lantern [2007-11-24 15:48:04]:
> --- Juiceman wrote:
> > On Nov 24, 2007 2:45 PM, Thomas
> > wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA512
> > >
> > > freenet.googlecode.com is only synced once a day,
> r15947 and r15948 are commits from today, so they
> > > should
