tagValues.put(new TextTag("EditionNumber"),
(((FCPTransport)blog.getPublishTransport()).getEdition()+ 1) +"");
> }
> tagValues.put(new TextTag("IndexPageLink"), blog.getBaseUrl() +
blog.getArchiveIndexFileName());
> tagValues.put(curDateTag, new Date());
>
> ___
> cvs mailing list
> cvs at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvs
>
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080416/d595396c/attachment.pgp>
L:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080416/f385e428/attachment.pgp>
Hey,
thanks for the answers - one always get good ones if the question is polite
8-D. I'll try the daniel_cheng proposal as well. Yes - GCJ uses the boehm-gc
as garbage collector. Which is limited by the "-mx=xxxM" parameter by a call
to _Z22_Jv_SetMaximumHeapSizePKc() (ref:
http://download-ma
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Is it better to report actual CHKs, or block numbers? Maybe we should do
> both? We would only need block numbers for selective reinsertion (the next
> logical step), although there isn't really any good reason not to report
> CHKs.
For the use I had in mind, I don't thi
* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-16 22:33:26]:
> Relative links don't work?
>
Flogs might contain links which can't be relative... like the "bookmark
me!" one.
> On Wednesday 16 April 2008 18:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: dieppe
> > Date: 2008-04-16 17:40:18 + (Wed
(sorry for double posting if it's the case, but I can't see my first
answer...)
Matthew Toseland a écrit :
Relative links don't work?
They do work, but they were hardcoded, so they pointed out to the wrong
edition number after one reinsertion (not a big deal, but nextgent told
me that
reenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080416/5e38fc6e/attachment.pgp>
Also, your diff is empty. This might be a kmail problem on my end
though...
>
> It's a problem on your end.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080416/6d95a6aa/attachment.pgp>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080416/b581e4b2/attachment.pgp>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland a écrit :
| Relative links don't work?
|
They do work, but they were hardcoded, so they pointed out to the wrong
edition number after one reinsertion (not a big deal, but nextgent told
me that it's faster to point to the same editi
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Cheng
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Sven-Ola T?cke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > to limit memory consumption, one can restart a freenet node on a regulary
> > basis. Hence a question: does it have an impact to others, if a couple of
> > nodes
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Sven-Ola T?cke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to limit memory consumption, one can restart a freenet node on a regulary
> basis. Hence a question: does it have an impact to others, if a couple of
> nodes do this? Say 50-100 nodes restaring every hour or so...
>
> // Sven-Ola
Relative links don't work?
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 18:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: dieppe
> Date: 2008-04-16 17:40:18 + (Wed, 16 Apr 2008)
> New Revision: 19372
>
> Modified:
>trunk/apps/thingamablog/src/net/sf/thingamablog/blog/TBWeblog.java
>
trunk/apps/thingamablog/src
Would anyone whose node runs opennet 24x7 and has a direct connection to the
internet / working port forwarding, and who wants to be an opennet seednode,
please send me their opennet noderef? You may have to enable the "be a
seednode" option in the config, but you need to send me your noderef as
Hey,
thanks for the answers - one always get good ones if the question is polite
8-D. I'll try the daniel_cheng proposal as well. Yes - GCJ uses the boehm-gc
as garbage collector. Which is limited by the "-mx=xxxM" parameter by a call
to _Z22_Jv_SetMaximumHeapSizePKc() (ref:
http://download-ma
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Is it better to report actual CHKs, or block numbers? Maybe we should do
> both? We would only need block numbers for selective reinsertion (the next
> logical step), although there isn't really any good reason not to report
> CHKs.
For the use I had in mind, I don't thi
ype: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080416/8f82e086/attachment.pgp>
IMHO to make this practical we need 2 things to happen in the node:
1. A much cheaper (RAM-wise) datastore.
*IF* random replacement is viable, and mrogers' simulations are promising, but
we need some more simulations with a more realistic model of requestors etc,
a simple random replacement tab
Hi,
to limit memory consumption, one can restart a freenet node on a regulary
basis. Hence a question: does it have an impact to others, if a couple of
nodes do this? Say 50-100 nodes restaring every hour or so...
// Sven-Ola
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 02:33, Florent Daignière wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-15 18:06:02]:
>
> > Is it better to report actual CHKs, or block numbers? Maybe we should do
both?
> > We would only need block numbers for selective reinsertion (the next
logical
> > s
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 09:11, Daniel Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Sven-Ola Tücke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > to limit memory consumption, one can restart a freenet node on a regulary
> > basis. Hence a question: does it have an impact to others, if a couple o
nWgGAzHvtbFA,6wj05kvrZMGtQSsCCtAV3eGB8TGzQ3196la2lSSMvog,AAIC--8
> > Node -> Client: EndMessage
> >
> ___
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080416/5da4ea9c/attachment.pgp>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Sven-Ola Tücke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > to limit memory consumption, one can restart a freenet node on a regulary
> > basis. Hence a question: does it have an impact t
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Sven-Ola Tücke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to limit memory consumption, one can restart a freenet node on a regulary
> basis. Hence a question: does it have an impact to others, if a couple of
> nodes do this? Say 50-100 nodes restaring every hour or so.
On Tuesday 15 April 2008 19:06:02 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Also, your diff is empty. This might be a kmail problem on my end though...
No problem with kmail here...
David
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_
25 matches
Mail list logo
