-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
| On Sunday 04 May 2008 01:49, Tommy[D] wrote:
|> Singularity schrieb:
|> | Matthew Toseland ha scritto:
|> |> On Saturday 03 May 2008 21:00, Singularity wrote:
|> |>
|> |>> Hi all,
|> |>>
|> |>> I'm a (quite) new Freenet
;
> Regards,
> Victor Denisov.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080505/50a8a60f/attachment.pgp>
---
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080505/538e3b78/attachment.pgp>
earing OOM hook?
>
> I deleted that because I introduced that but I am not sure if this
> clearing is safe.
It should be.
> IMO, the current OOMHook free too few memory. I wanted to introduce
> some more hooks, but have no idea where it is safe to be done. If you
> have any suggestions, please tell.
Either propose them here, or go ahead and wait for me to complain. :)
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080505/06ff6bcf/attachment.pgp>
oad just said zero meant unlimited. Maybe that is the very
> > bug you are chasing, it is using unlimited memory?
>
> javadoc say setCacheSize(0) would use getCachePrecent() % of
> Runtime#getMaxMemory().
Practice says otherwise. Maybe we're missing something?
---
e the strong RandomSource for key
generation.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080505/3dee061e/attachment.pgp>
12 instance on my box.
Okay, if you've measured it then we'll go with it.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080505/89684f26/attachment.pgp>
create some
strange chars for italian
> users. Could you stop freenet, delete the properties file, start freenet and
do the update again?
That's very odd. Is it broken in trunk?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: app
On May 4, 2008, at 5:20 AM, Daniel Cheng wrote:
> On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:40 AM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
>> On Friday 02 May 2008 17:06, j16sdiz at freenetproject.org wrote:
>>> Author: j16sdiz
>>> Date: 2008-05-02 16:06:08 + (Fri, 02 May 2008)
>>> New Revision: 19685
>>>
>>> Modified:
On May 4, 2008, at 5:20 AM, Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:40 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 02 May 2008 17:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: j16sdiz
Date: 2008-05-02 16:06:08 + (Fri, 02 May 2008)
New Revision: 19685
Modified:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Robert Hailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 4, 2008, at 5:20 AM, Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:40 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 02 May 2008 17:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: j16sdiz
Date: 2008-05-02
On Sunday 04 May 2008 01:49, Tommy[D] wrote:
Singularity schrieb:
| Matthew Toseland ha scritto:
| On Saturday 03 May 2008 21:00, Singularity wrote:
|
| Hi all,
|
| I'm a (quite) new Freenet user,
|
| I have updated IT translation (all incomplete and remaining strings);
|
| Applied to
On Sunday 04 May 2008 10:00, Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 02 May 2008 11:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: j16sdiz
Date: 2008-05-02 10:09:13 + (Fri, 02 May 2008)
New Revision: 19674
Modified:
On Sunday 04 May 2008 02:44, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-03 19:44:25]:
On Saturday 03 May 2008 12:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-05-03 11:48:01 + (Sat, 03 May 2008)
New Revision: 19694
Modified:
On Monday 05 May 2008 16:48, Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Robert Hailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 4, 2008, at 5:20 AM, Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:40 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 02 May 2008 17:06, [EMAIL
On Sunday 04 May 2008 15:51, Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
int sleeptime = aggressiveGCModificator;
if(sleeptime = 0) { // We are done
ps.queueTimedJob(this, 120 *
On Sunday 04 May 2008 15:54, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-04 22:51:06]:
IMO, the current OOMHook free too few memory. I wanted to introduce
some more hooks, but have no idea where it is safe to be done. If you
have any suggestions, please tell.
Get
On Sunday 04 May 2008 11:44, Victor Denisov wrote:
| - More seednodes. If you have a node with reasonable upstream
bandwidth and
| which is not NATed, please turn on the seednode option, and send us your
| opennet noderef.
I'll move my node to a new box tomorrow, it has a symmetric 8 Mbit/s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
| On Sunday 04 May 2008 01:49, Tommy[D] wrote:
| Singularity schrieb:
| | Matthew Toseland ha scritto:
| | On Saturday 03 May 2008 21:00, Singularity wrote:
| |
| | Hi all,
| |
| | I'm a (quite) new Freenet user,
| |
| | I
Did another usability test. Problems:
- The installer is signed by nextgens. We should change this. But this wasn't
reported by the user, it's just my view.
- Freenet not only didn't find Firefox (2.0.0.14, english, custom theme), it
didn't find any web browser of any kind: it opened a command
On Monday 05 May 2008 13:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: j16sdiz
Date: 2008-05-05 12:11:06 + (Mon, 05 May 2008)
New Revision: 19754
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/FECCodec.java
Log:
don't use lastPolledMaxRunningFECThreads (it didn't work anyway)
Can't it be
On Monday 05 May 2008 14:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: j16sdiz
Date: 2008-05-05 13:01:35 + (Mon, 05 May 2008)
New Revision: 19758
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/io/comm/MessageFilter.java
Log:
use LinkedList instead of Vector(1,1)
Why? LinkedList will use more memory!!
On Monday 05 May 2008 14:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: j16sdiz
Date: 2008-05-05 13:01:55 + (Mon, 05 May 2008)
New Revision: 19759
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/NumberedItemComparator.java
Log:
use assert
Base must be odd?? Explain?
Also the class should be
On Tuesday 06 May 2008 01:40, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Monday 05 May 2008 14:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: j16sdiz
Date: 2008-05-05 13:01:35 + (Mon, 05 May 2008)
New Revision: 19758
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/io/comm/MessageFilter.java
Log:
use LinkedList
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 05 May 2008 14:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: j16sdiz
Date: 2008-05-05 13:01:55 + (Mon, 05 May 2008)
New Revision: 19759
Modified:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-06 00:28:10]:
Author: toad
Date: 2008-05-06 00:28:09 + (Tue, 06 May 2008)
New Revision: 19778
Modified:
trunk/apps/new_installer/res/windows/browse.cmd
Log:
doh
Modified: trunk/apps/new_installer/res/windows/browse.cmd
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-05 18:54:57]:
On Sunday 04 May 2008 02:44, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-03 19:44:25]:
On Saturday 03 May 2008 12:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-05-03 11:48:01 +
27 matches
Mail list logo
