chment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090302/091ddc2c/attachment.pgp>
d up
> with
> > > > > hundreds of these jobs running in parallel?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > In that case we are screwed anyway; Introduce a "fast-fail" using a
> > > > volatile boolean if you think it's worth it.
> > >
> > > What is the purpose of the 200ms period?
> >
> > Good question; that's your code ;)
> >
> > I think we use the meanPingTime of connected peers in the load-balancing
> > algorithm... It does make sense to have "consistent" values.
> >
> > I guess that 200ms is just an arbitrarily chosen value.
>
> In which case, why not requeue after running?
Consistency?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090302/f3cbc9f3/attachment.pgp>
hment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090302/570bab78/attachment.pgp>
---
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090302/9227c826/attachment.pgp>
nts/20090302/03b9a929/attachment.obj>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090302/03b9a929/attachment.pgp>
next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090302/085941c9/attachment.pgp>
rian.
>
> [1] The Exhibit 1: http://unicode.org/copyright.html#Exhibit1
> [2] http://icu-project.org/repos/icu/icu/trunk/license.html
Sounds fine to me. You might want to look it up, maybe even ask fsf, but it
should be a known issue...
>
> > as well as his earlier major improvements to XMLSpider, which now uses the
> > Perst database to store its progress and minimise memory usage. IMHO we
> > should improve the UI of the XMLLibrarian before releasing 0.8.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090302/743a9bcd/attachment.pgp>
--- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090302/0f033e7f/attachment.pgp>
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Florent Daigni?re
wrote:
> * Evan Daniel [2009-02-27 10:58:19]:
>> I think it would be inappropriate to reduce the connection limit
>> without further testing.
[...]
> Tweaking that code based on one's experience is just plain silly.
Then it seems we're in
nature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090302/8d506a5d/attachment.pgp>
Right now we divide files up into segments of 128 blocks. Each block is 32kB.
We add another 128 check blocks, so that any 128 of the 256 can be used to
reconstruct the original data and all the blocks. Thus, the odds of a full
size segment not being fetchable are quite low, even if the chances
On Saturday 31 January 2009 12:00:48 svenerichoffm...@gmx.de wrote:
on uservoice this is on top.
Is there an option to fullfill users whishes?
You might start with a very small window
like base is always the current 20 limit and scale up to 30 max
and that only if upload is set to
On Friday 27 February 2009 05:02:51 Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
PROGRESS REPORT
===
FINANCIAL STATUS:
We have $3566.87, that's enough for around another 47 days after my
current
(approximately
On Friday 27 February 2009 15:58:19 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
- Possibly increase the number of nodes faster nodes can connect to.
[...]
TOP FIVE USERVOICE SUGGESTIONS:
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier.
This is
updated to r25869
Luke
freenet.l10n.it.override.properties_luke771_090302
Description: Binary data
pgptV1qn5qs66.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
* j16s...@freenetproject.org j16s...@freenetproject.org [2009-03-01 07:25:01]:
Author: j16sdiz
Date: 2009-03-01 07:25:00 + (Sun, 01 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 25866
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/filter/PNGFilter.java
Log:
Better error reporting on extra data in PNG
* Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com [2009-02-27 10:58:19]:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
- Possibly increase the number of nodes faster nodes can connect to.
[...]
TOP FIVE USERVOICE SUGGESTIONS:
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier.
This is
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-02-26 23:26:47]:
On Thursday 26 February 2009 20:29:34 Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org [2009-02-25 17:59:32]:
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 10:00:22 Florent Daigniere wrote:
Matthew Toseland
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Florent Daignière
nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote:
* Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com [2009-02-27 10:58:19]:
I think it would be inappropriate to reduce the connection limit
without further testing.
[...]
Tweaking that code based on one's experience is just plain
* Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com [2009-03-02 15:41:59]:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Florent Daignière
nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote:
* Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com [2009-02-27 10:58:19]:
I think it would be inappropriate to reduce the connection limit
without further testing.
[...]
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Florent Daignière
nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote:
* j16s...@freenetproject.org j16s...@freenetproject.org [2009-03-01
07:25:01]:
Author: j16sdiz
Date: 2009-03-01 07:25:00 + (Sun, 01 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 25866
Modified:
Please apply this patch.
http://sdiz.net/temp/build-png-test.patch
This copy the data files needed for the newly added png filter test.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:04 PM, svn-bu...@freenetproject.org wrote:
Buildfile: build.xml
mkdir:
[...]
[junit] Running
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:00 PM, j16s...@freenetproject.org wrote:
Author: j16sdiz
Date: 2009-03-03 05:00:59 + (Tue, 03 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 25876
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/filter/PNGFilter.java
Log:
PNGFilter should throw DataFormatException
It was
23 matches
Mail list logo
