Not if you want the installer done this year :P.
The translation stuff I added is "bare bone"/quite KISS.
None of us have all the time in the world, so it is really the good old
time vs. gain weighing for me. Long-term it could indeed be ideal to
make a .po import function or something like tha
Am Freitag 24 April 2009 09:50:15 schrieb xor:
> > Multiplication Keys
> >
> > Long CHK keys are ok for me, most important is that they are
> > static and all inserts produces the same key.
>
> I second that. I want the ability to re-insert already inserted files
> without changing the URI.
As I a
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> The SVN repository is read-only, and I have taken a dump. It will be posted to
> Freenet soon and I will announce the location of the file, the gpg signature
> etc. We might also put it on the mirrors network, but it is 281MB, so I dunno
while ((scom = sc.nextCommand()) != null) {
> > + System.err.println("Executing command: " +
> > scom);
> > + scom.execute(sim);
> > + }
> > +
> > + System.err.println("Simulation ran in: "
> > + + (System.currentTimeMillis() - rtime)
> > + " ms.");
> > +
> > + } catch (IOException e) {
> > + System.err.println("IO Error reading script: " + e);
> > + System.exit(1);
> > + return; // for compiler
> > + } catch (ScriptException e) {
> > + System.err.println("Error in script: " +
> > e.getMessage());
> > + System.exit(1);
> > + return; // for compiler
> > + }
> > +
> > + out.println(sim.info());
> > + out.println(ds.info());
> > +
> > + out.flush();
> > + out.close();
> > + }
> > +
> > + private static DataSpace createDataSpace(Settings st) {
> > + String name = st.get("dsType", "PopularityDataSpace");
> > + if (name.equals("LimitedDataSpace")) {
> > + return new LimitedDataSpace(st.getInt("dsMaxDocs",
> > 1), st.getInt(
> > + "dsMinSize", 1000),
> > st.getInt("dsMaxSize", 2000));
> > + /* /* */
> > +
> > + } else if (name.equals("PopularityDataSpace")) {
> > + return new PopularityDataSpace(st.getInt("dsMaxDocs",
> > 1), st
> > + .getDouble("dsPopDecay", 1.0),
> > + st.getInt("dsMinSize", 1000),
> > st.getInt("dsMaxSize", 2000));
> > + } else {
> > + throw new SimulationException("DataSpace type " + name
> > + + " unknown.");
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > +}
> >
> ...
>
> > Added: trunk/apps/simsalabim/darknet/DarknetNode.java
> > ===
> > --- trunk/apps/simsalabim/darknet/DarknetNode.java
> (rev 0)
> > +++ trunk/apps/simsalabim/darknet/DarknetNode.java 2009-02-11 13:53:49 UTC
> (rev 25585)
> > @@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
> > +package simsalabim.darknet;
> > +import simsalabim.*;
> > +import java.util.*;
> > +import simsalabim.utils.*;
> > +
> > +public class DarknetNode extends Node {
> > +
> > + protected LRUHash data;
> > +
> > + protected Person user;
> > +
> > + protected CircleKey pos;
> > + protected LinkedList neighbors;
> > + protected LinkedList openNeighbors;
> > + final int nOpen;
> > +
> > + private boolean inNetwork = false;
> > +
> > + private int numQueries = 0;
> > +
> > + public DarknetNode(Darknet god, int num, Person user, CircleKey pos,
> > + int nOpen) {
> > + super(god, num);
> > + this.user = user;
> > +
> > + this.pos = pos;
> > + this.nOpen = nOpen;
> > +
> > + data = new LRUHash(god.STORE_SIZE);
> > + neighbors = new LinkedList();
> > + openNeighbors = new LinkedList();
> > + }
> > +
> > +
> > +
> > + public DarknetRoute findRoute(CircleKey k, DarknetRoute dnr,
> > + int maxNoImprove) {
> > +
> > + if (!inNetwork)
> > + throw new Error("Node not in Network routed to: " +
> > this);
> > + if (!isActive())
> > + throw new Error("Node that is active routed to: " +
> > this);
> > +
> > + /*
> > +* This deviates in two ways from true Freenet routing. Firstly
> > I don't
> > +* backtrack, which I should, but which adds complication.
> > Secondly
> > +* Freenet doesn't have a fixed maxSteps, but stops after
> > taking x steps
> > +* without coming closer to the target value.
>
> That hasn't been true for a long time. The simulator in darknet/ is a
> separate, older simulator?
Yes, this is old stuff.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090424/e0af6b5a/attachment.pgp>
Florent Daigniere wrote:
> j16sdiz at freenetproject.org wrote:
>> Author: j16sdiz
>> Date: 2009-04-24 03:40:37 + (Fri, 24 Apr 2009)
>> New Revision: 27277
>>
>> Modified:
>>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/Buffer.java
>>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/ShortBuffer.java
>> Log:
>> Mor
The SVN repository is read-only, and I have taken a dump. It will be posted to
Freenet soon and I will announce the location of the file, the gpg signature
etc. We might also put it on the mirrors network, but it is 281MB, so I dunno
if this is a good idea. In the meantime, the SHA256 checksum i
On Friday 24 April 2009 11:09:17 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I am migrating the source to github. Apologies for not providing more notice.
> SVN is now READ ONLY.
What is the url to use to clone/pull this repository
TIA
Ed
I propose "node" for sure. The thing you are running is a dot in the
network; a knot in the freenet; a small protected, hardened pearl,
strung to other alikes; "node" just fits perfectly. Also, this
"knot"-idea can be visualized very nicely if you want to visualize the
connections to other peers wi
f free software -
http://infinite-hands.draketo.de
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090424/55bb60a6/attachment.pgp>
On Friday 24 April 2009 06:40:16 bbac...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Long CHK keys are ok for me, most important is that they are static
> and all inserts produces the same key.
Well, we will still have content types. Although using ?type= is a
plausible option.
> Will the CHK keys have a fix length
On Friday 24 April 2009 11:09:17 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I am migrating the source to github. Apologies for not providing more notice.
> SVN is now READ ONLY.
What is the url to use to clone/pull this repository
TIA
Ed
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@free
:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090424/69d2f6d1/attachment.pgp>
Ian Clarke skrev:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:05 AM, xor mailto:x...@gmx.li>> wrote:
>
> We DO NOT need a new web interface. Our current web interface is easy to
> use, works well, is sufficient, and it is also easy to write plugins
> which
> use it - I've worked with it for WoT an
Matthew Toseland skrev:
> On Friday 10 April 2009 17:17:45 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> I suppose now is not the right time to be complaining about translations in
>> code? I guess we can change the build process later on so that they start as
>> something like a SimpleFieldSet and get converted du
> It creates a problem in Germany, since we also have a hosting company named
> freenet.
I've got Google Alerts running on 'freenet' and 90%+ of each day
results are from the german ISP/Hosting company, I think we can't do
anything about it. =/
I saw that Freenet's website has the verify code of
Am Freitag 24 April 2009 09:50:15 schrieb xor:
> > Multiplication Keys
> >
> > Long CHK keys are ok for me, most important is that they are
> > static and all inserts produces the same key.
>
> I second that. I want the ability to re-insert already inserted files
> without changing the URI.
As I a
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 09:03:12PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 February 2009 13:53:50 v...@freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: vive
> > Date: 2009-02-11 13:53:49 + (Wed, 11 Feb 2009)
> > New Revision: 25585
> > Added:
> > Log:
> > simsalabim: Freenet 0.7 simulator
> >
>
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 23 April 2009 00:05:40 Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:17 PM, xor wrote:
>> > ?"Node" should really be replaced with "Client" *everywhere* because
>> > client is the common word.
>>
>> Is it? ?When I talk to non-techies about a "client" they th
j16sdiz at freenetproject.org wrote:
> Author: j16sdiz
> Date: 2009-04-24 03:40:37 + (Fri, 24 Apr 2009)
> New Revision: 27277
>
> Modified:
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/Buffer.java
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/ShortBuffer.java
> Log:
> More errror checking
>
That's good b
> It creates a problem in Germany, since we also have a hosting company named
> freenet.
I've got Google Alerts running on 'freenet' and 90%+ of each day
results are from the german ISP/Hosting company, I think we can't do
anything about it. =/
I saw that Freenet's website has the verify code of
I propose "node" for sure. The thing you are running is a dot in the
network; a knot in the freenet; a small protected, hardened pearl,
strung to other alikes; "node" just fits perfectly. Also, this
"knot"-idea can be visualized very nicely if you want to visualize the
connections to other peers wi
> -Original Message-
> From: devl-bounces at freenetproject.org
> [mailto:devl-bounces at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of
> bbackde at googlemail.com
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 7:40 AM
> To: Discussion of development issues
> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] CMKs don't work,but there are
> However, some alternative names to try on...
> Reliable Fetch Key RFK
> Reliable Hash Key RHK
> Multiple Hash Key MHK
> Multi-link Key MLK
> Matthew's Multiplier Key MMK
I vote for:
FHK - File Hash Key
... because it is the easiest to explain to newbies :)
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 22:05:18 schrieb Robert Hailey:
> > "The Freenet software running on your computer" is probably what I
> > would use to describe what "node" means to non-techy users.
> > Couldn't it just use "Your computer is downloading this page from
> > Freenet", that's what people w
I am migrating the source to github. Apologies for not providing more notice.
SVN is now READ ONLY.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/
2009/4/24 :
> Author: sashee
> Date: 2009-04-23 20:06:00 + (Thu, 23 Apr 2009)
> New Revision: 27271
>
> Added:
> ? trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/staticfiles/js/
> ? trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/staticfiles/js/progresspage.js
> Modified:
> ? trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/
2009/4/23 Matthew Toseland :
> On Wednesday 15 April 2009 07:43:14 j16sdiz at freenetproject.org wrote:
>> Author: j16sdiz
>> Date: 2009-04-15 06:43:12 + (Wed, 15 Apr 2009)
>> New Revision: 26829
>>
>> Modified:
>> ? ?trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/fcp/FCPClient.java
>> Log:
>> revert r26828: r
Long CHK keys are ok for me, most important is that they are static
and all inserts produces the same key.
Will the CHK keys have a fix length?
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 03:06, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Thursday 23 April 2009 21:14:01 guido wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 14:48:43 schrieb
Florent Daigniere wrote:
> j16s...@freenetproject.org wrote:
>> Author: j16sdiz
>> Date: 2009-04-24 03:40:37 + (Fri, 24 Apr 2009)
>> New Revision: 27277
>>
>> Modified:
>>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/Buffer.java
>>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/ShortBuffer.java
>> Log:
>> More e
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 23 April 2009 00:05:40 Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:17 PM, xor wrote:
>> > "Node" should really be replaced with "Client" *everywhere* because
>> > client is the common word.
>>
>> Is it? When I talk to non-techies about a "client" they th
j16s...@freenetproject.org wrote:
> Author: j16sdiz
> Date: 2009-04-24 03:40:37 + (Fri, 24 Apr 2009)
> New Revision: 27277
>
> Modified:
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/Buffer.java
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/ShortBuffer.java
> Log:
> More errror checking
>
That's good but
On Friday 24 April 2009 00:44:59 Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> >> Is it? ?When I talk to non-techies about a "client" they think I'm
referring
> >> to the person that employs a lawyer. ?I think the least confusing term to
> >> use in this contex
On Thursday 23 April 2009 21:14:01 guido wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 14:48:43 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > I would really appreciate input on option 2 i.e. how much of a problem are
> > long CHKs?
>
> If CHK key lengths as they are now are not bad enough to keep people from
> using them
On Thursday 23 April 2009 20:06:13 VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I would really appreciate input on option 2 i.e. how much of a problem are
> > long CHKs?
>
> If Long CHKs will become too much of a problem, and people won't mind their
> content being spoofed, then people
> -Original Message-
> From: devl-boun...@freenetproject.org
> [mailto:devl-boun...@freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of
> bbac...@googlemail.com
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 7:40 AM
> To: Discussion of development issues
> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] CMKs don't work,but there are
> othe
> However, some alternative names to try on...
> Reliable Fetch Key RFK
> Reliable Hash Key RHK
> Multiple Hash Key MHK
> Multi-link Key MLK
> Matthew's Multiplier Key MMK
I vote for:
FHK - File Hash Key
... because it is the easiest to explain to newbies :)
_
36 matches
Mail list logo
