user was forced to
use port 53(udp) to
be able to use freenet.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090504/67b6ea2c/attachment.pgp>
/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090504/b908e4ad/attachment.pgp>
s.draketo.de
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090504/fe147250/attachment.pgp>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> 5. Use port 80,443,53,1863 for communication. (74 votes)
>
> I have no idea how this got into the top 5! Any ideas? People trying to run
> nodes at work perhaps?
University students who want to connect their node in uni with one that runs
dear all
i'm coding a distributed indexing service as my gsoc project... problem is, i
don't know what to name it.
current ideas:
- interdex - sounds like a corporation
- distrex - sounds like "distress"
- distridex - sounds like an insecticide
- wydex - sounds like a stock
- codex - could be
ad (though probably not the disk load?
> hmm...)
Maybe.
>
> Or you could just partition the keyspace by hashing and trust that
> equal size partitions will have equal populations.
This may be better and is certainly easier.
>
> Evan Daniel
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090504/800efeed/attachment.pgp>
?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090504/7fbddc90/attachment.pgp>
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> 1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
>
> As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more performance.
I'll reiterate a point I've made before.
While this represents a simple plea for performance, I don't think
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more performance.
2. One GUI for all. (155 votes)
This is usability, particularly bundling more functionality. VIVE LA Freetalk!
3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
Remarkably high
On Saturday 02 May 2009 01:23:23 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Saturday 02 May 2009 00:53:27 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 01 May
dear all
i'm coding a distributed indexing service as my gsoc project... problem is, i
don't know what to name it.
current ideas:
- interdex - sounds like a corporation
- distrex - sounds like distress
- distridex - sounds like an insecticide
- wydex - sounds like a stock
- codex - could be
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more performance.
I'll reiterate a point I've made before.
While this represents a simple plea for
commit ffe38b43b83b28323075fcde898fad4a3dc8df3f
Author: platy mpb...@gmail.com
Date: Fri May 1 01:45:09 2009 +0100
Added a new plugin Http interface with support for response headers
###
The idea was to make plugins use Exceptions to send headers back to
Toadlets; Why is that interface
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
games?
Or with other filesharing services (short lived torrents, downloading in
Gnutella) or with graphics editing or video
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
5. Use port 80,443,53,1863 for communication. (74 votes)
I have no idea how this got into the top 5! Any ideas? People trying to run
nodes at work perhaps?
Maybe not wanting the provider to be able to just shut down nonstandard ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
5. Use port 80,443,53,1863 for communication. (74 votes)
I have no idea how this got into the top 5! Any ideas? People trying to run
nodes at work perhaps?
University students who want to connect their node in uni with one that runs
somewhere
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more performance.
2. One GUI for all. (155 votes)
This is usability, particularly bundling more functionality. VIVE LA Freetalk!
3. Add a 'pause' feature.
On Monday 04 May 2009 17:29:51 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more
performance.
I'll reiterate a point I've
Please don't do this.
Closer is for closing the streams _silently_.
(most often in the finally{} block when error have occurred already/expected)
If you want logging, you should call .close() directly.
commit 9645c379de05e4f884ac3c1e2ef616884232963c
Author: xor x...@freenetproject.org
Date:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Monday 04 May 2009 17:29:51 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes)
As I have mentioned IMHO this
20 matches
Mail list logo
