On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 May 2009 00:56:22 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> On one prior occasion (this year), we have authorised a mailing list archive
>> site to remove messages posted by somebody. I have now had another mail
>> asking for us to
Matthew Toseland skrev:
> On Thursday 21 May 2009 11:54:32 Zero3 wrote:
>> Matthew Toseland skrev:
>>> On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:43:26 Zero3 wrote:
Colin Davis skrev:
> As implemented currently, Private browsing is all-or-nothing in
> FF3.5beta4 and Safari, but Google Chrome is
$
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090525/9958925f/attachment.pgp>
After reading the rants of a user complaining about javaws not working on
#freenet, I decided to try it out:
$wget https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/new_installer_offline.jar
$jarsigner -verify new_installer_offline_1211.jar
jar is unsigned. (signatures missing or not parsable)
Needless
Matthew Toseland skrev:
On Thursday 21 May 2009 11:54:32 Zero3 wrote:
Matthew Toseland skrev:
On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:43:26 Zero3 wrote:
Colin Davis skrev:
As implemented currently, Private browsing is all-or-nothing in
FF3.5beta4 and Safari, but Google Chrome is per-window.
Firefox has
On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daignière wrote:
And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better
way to get feedback from users.
Couldn't a bug report function be integrated directly into the web-interface?
Upper-right corner, a little bug icon with the text
On one prior occasion (this year), we have authorised a mailing list archive
site to remove messages posted by somebody. I have now had another mail asking
for us to remove somebody's name from two archives which we don't run - which
generally requires him asking them and getting authorisation
Matthew Toseland wrote:
On one prior occasion (this year), we have authorised a mailing list archive
site to remove messages posted by somebody. I have now had another mail
asking for us to remove somebody's name from two archives which we don't run
- which generally requires him asking them
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 00:56:22 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On one prior occasion (this year), we have authorised a mailing list archive
site to remove messages posted by somebody. I have now had another mail
asking for us to remove somebody's name from two archives which we don't run
- which
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 00:56:22 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On one prior occasion (this year), we have authorised a mailing list archive
site to remove messages posted by somebody. I have now had another mail
10 matches
Mail list logo
