On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Cheng wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Zero3 wrote:
>> Matthew Toseland skrev:
>>> Could it be an install path problem, something specific to Windows maybe?
>>
>> He said: "and updated freenet now nothing works keep getting no start up
>> script". Doe
ature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090605/47d1abd9/attachment.pgp>
uplicated bugs fields?
Or freeform HTML into which these could be converted, as with Trac?
>
> [...]
Other important features?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090605/a7e6c7fe/attachment.pgp>
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Matthew
> Toseland wrote:
>> On Thursday 04 June 2009 17:08:22 Ian Clarke wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Matthew Toseland
>>> wrote:
>>> > What bug tracker should we use? Trac? Jira? Lighthouse? Somethi
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Zero3 wrote:
> Matthew Toseland skrev:
>> Could it be an install path problem, something specific to Windows maybe?
>
> He said: "and updated freenet now nothing works keep getting no start up
> script". Does he mean updating using update.cmd? And what is this
> "get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Freenet 0.7 build 1215 is now available. Changes include:
> - Hopefully fix a bug causing Freenet to not reconnect after losing the
> internet connection and then it being restored.
> - Vario
t think that is possible no ?
It might be possible to do FCP support for differently encrypted CHKs, if there
is demand for it.
>
> sich
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090605/b9358370/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> Why is Lighthouse better than Mantis or Trac, both of which we could get from
> sourceforge? Mantis has the clear advantage that we know it. If Lighthouse
> does exactly the same as Mantis and is slightly prettier, for example, there
> is
uild 1.6.0_14-b08)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode)
>
> Freenet seems to be functioning normally.
>
> Evan Daniel
Could it be an install path problem, something specific to Windows maybe?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090605/95e61766/attachment.pgp>
On Saturday 06 June 2009 00:01:01 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Freenet 0.7 build 1215 is now available. Changes include:
> - Hopefully fix a bug causing Freenet to not reconnect after losing the
> internet connection and then it being restored.
> - Various improvements to the web interface, including
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> On Thursday, 4. June 2009 20:02:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> > I vote for ?lighthouse. ?I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and
>> > Lighthouse is better than all. ?It is simple, user friendly, doesn't
>> > impose any particular way o
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> On Friday 05 June 2009 07:54:08 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> On Thursday, 4. June 2009 20:02:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> > > I vote for ?lighthouse. ?I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and
>> > > Lighthouse is better than all. ?It is
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 04 June 2009 17:08:22 Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Matthew Toseland
>> wrote:
>> > What bug tracker should we use? Trac? Jira? Lighthouse? Something else?
>>
>> I vote for ?lighthouse. ?I've used Mantis,
Matthew Toseland skrev:
> Translators, we need updates for the new strings in 1215 and for all of the
> untranslated strings in your various languages.
Ditto for the Windows Installer! Strings should be more or less frozen
by now.
Everyone is welcome to translate or proofread the existing trans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Freenet 0.7 build 1215 is now available. Changes include:
> - Hopefully fix a bug causing Freenet to not reconnect after losing the
> internet connection and then it being restored.
> - Vario
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> Why is Lighthouse better than Mantis or Trac, both of which we could get from
> sourceforge? Mantis has the clear advantage that we know it. If Lighthouse
> does exactly the same as Mantis and is slightly prettier, for example, there
> is
Matthew Toseland skrev:
> Could it be an install path problem, something specific to Windows maybe?
He said: "and updated freenet now nothing works keep getting no start up
script". Does he mean updating using update.cmd? And what is this
"getting no start up script"? Perhaps an error message by
On Friday 05 June 2009 23:49:42 Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > On Thursday, 4. June 2009 20:02:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >> > I vote for lighthouse. I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and
> >> > Lighthouse is better than all. It is simpl
On Friday 05 June 2009 23:43:12 Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Matthew
> Toseland wrote:
> > On Friday 05 June 2009 07:54:08 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> >> On Thursday, 4. June 2009 20:02:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >> > > I vote for lighthouse. I've used Mantis, Trac, an
Freenet 0.7 build 1215 is now available. Changes include:
- Hopefully fix a bug causing Freenet to not reconnect after losing the
internet connection and then it being restored.
- Various improvements to the web interface, including a Chat Forums toadlet
explaining where to get FMS and Frost, thi
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> On Thursday, 4. June 2009 20:02:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> > I vote for lighthouse. I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and
>> > Lighthouse is better than all. It is simple, user friendly, doesn't
>> > impose any particular way o
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> On Friday 05 June 2009 07:54:08 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> On Thursday, 4. June 2009 20:02:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> > > I vote for lighthouse. I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and
>> > > Lighthouse is better than all. It is
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 04 June 2009 17:08:22 Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Matthew Toseland
>> wrote:
>> > What bug tracker should we use? Trac? Jira? Lighthouse? Something else?
>>
>> I vote for lighthouse. I've used Mantis,
On Friday 05 June 2009 07:54:08 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> On Thursday, 4. June 2009 20:02:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > I vote for lighthouse. I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and
> > > Lighthouse is better than all. It is simple, user friendly, doesn't
> > > impose any particular wa
On Friday 05 June 2009 00:59:09 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Matthew
> Toseland wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 June 2009 17:08:22 Ian Clarke wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Matthew Toseland
> >> wrote:
> >> > What bug tracker should we use? Trac? Jira? Lighthouse? S
On Thursday 04 June 2009 17:09:51 sich wrote:
> Matthew Toseland a écrit :
> > SSKs are 1KB and have rather high overheads. You need to insert a bunch of
> > CHKs under the SSK, and to make that safe you need the CHK data to be
> > encrypted. But also you need it for security, because *the SSK is
On Thursday 04 June 2009 22:33:40 Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > -- Forwarded message --
> > From: Philip Bych
> > To: Matthew Toseland
> > Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:46:46 +0100
> > Subject: Re: [freenet-support] free
- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090605/18e45768/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 04 June 2009 17:08:22 Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Matthew Toseland
>> wrote:
>> > What bug tracker should we use? Trac? Jira? Lighthouse? Something else?
>>
>> I vote for ?lighthouse. ?I've used Mantis,
29 matches
Mail list logo
