* xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]:
> On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker?
> > Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to get them
> > implemented... and it is spamming our inboxes (I'm s
I've put stopword support in Library, I think it behaves ideally in
deciding when to alter a search containing stop words or when to
reject it, except for not notifying the user if a stopword was removed
from their query.
For the moment I have only used 6 english stopwords : the, and, that,
have,
as scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090816/abbfef63/attachment.pgp>
who has "no business with whatsoever" cleans it
up than just having all of the bugtracker be deleted.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed messag
A.Rios skrev:
> Hi. I'm not suscribed to the list but I check it sometimes and I want
> to share my experience from last week related to the survey. First of
> all, the installation fails in my windows 2008 server, saying "Startup
> script could not find the Freenet service" (or something like that
e that in the future.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090816/71b677ee/attachment.pgp>
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Mantis Bug Tracker
Subject: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:11:11 +
Size: 3951
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090816/aca3427c/attachment.mht>
* xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]:
> On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker?
> > Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to get them
> > implemented... and it is spamming our inboxes (I'm s
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:19 AM, xor wrote:
>> On Sunday 16 August 2009 17:50:21 Ian Clarke wrote:
>>>
>>> Can't we use a 3rd party XML parsing library to get around this
>>> vulnerability?
>>
>> We should rather nag Sun or the responsible Mac
I've put stopword support in Library, I think it behaves ideally in
deciding when to alter a search containing stop words or when to
reject it, except for not notifying the user if a stopword was removed
from their query.
For the moment I have only used 6 english stopwords : the, and, that,
have,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:19 AM, xor wrote:
> On Sunday 16 August 2009 17:50:21 Ian Clarke wrote:
>>
>> Can't we use a 3rd party XML parsing library to get around this
>> vulnerability?
>
> We should rather nag Sun or the responsible Mac people (I don't know whether
> they have package management
This download seems rather slow, and there is a long (>20 seconds)
delay with the download bar at 100%.
Many people are likely to interpret this as it being broken (I nearly
did myself).
With the "Processing" stage of the installer, why is it necessary for
it to say "All done, please click Next"
Hi,
> In <4A85BB1D.2060704 at sq7.org>
> Colin Davis wrote:
> I'd like to reiterate that it would be best to give Matthew a way to
> build this on his machine, that way he can point it at any tag, and
> he can release a .tgz and a .deb at the same time.
Agreed. Actually, all needed
Hi,
> In <200908142025.27149.toad at amphibian.dyndns.org>
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > official: http://people.debian.org/~mhatta/debian/freenet
> > staging: http://people.debian.org/~mhatta/debian/freenet-staging
> What's the difference? The official one should be from the
> build
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:19 AM, xor wrote:
>> On Sunday 16 August 2009 17:50:21 Ian Clarke wrote:
>>>
>>> Can't we use a 3rd party XML parsing library to get around this
>>> vulnerability?
>>
>> We should rather nag Sun or the responsible Mac
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:19 AM, xor wrote:
> On Sunday 16 August 2009 17:50:21 Ian Clarke wrote:
>>
>> Can't we use a 3rd party XML parsing library to get around this
>> vulnerability?
>
> We should rather nag Sun or the responsible Mac people (I don't know whether
> they have package management
On Sunday 16 August 2009 17:50:21 Ian Clarke wrote:
>
> Can't we use a 3rd party XML parsing library to get around this
> vulnerability?
We should rather nag Sun or the responsible Mac people (I don't know whether
they have package management and just not upgraded the package yet or whether
Sun
This download seems rather slow, and there is a long (>20 seconds)
delay with the download bar at 100%.
Many people are likely to interpret this as it being broken (I nearly
did myself).
With the "Processing" stage of the installer, why is it necessary for
it to say "All done, please click Next"
On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker?
> Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to get them
> implemented... and it is spamming our inboxes (I'm still subscribed to
> most, like most of us)
Hi,
What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker?
Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to get them
implemented... and it is spamming our inboxes (I'm still subscribed to most,
like most of us).
Changing the priority of tickets you've no business with w
A.Rios skrev:
> Hi. I'm not suscribed to the list but I check it sometimes and I want
> to share my experience from last week related to the survey. First of
> all, the installation fails in my windows 2008 server, saying "Startup
> script could not find the Freenet service" (or something like that
On Saturday 15 August 2009 15:26:21 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> IMHO if we search for something we will often want to see old bugs. Hence
> resolved -> suspended, or resolved -> user not responsive, or something
> like that, is more appropriate than closed.
Okay, I'll use that in the future.
signa
22 matches
Mail list logo
