uff in the papers section of the website, starting with the
> >>> CCC video:
> >>>
> >>> http://freenetproject.org/papers.html
> >>> http://freenetproject.org/22c3vid.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks a lot,
> >>>>
> >>>> Michael
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090902/92beb447/attachment.pgp>
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 September 2009 01:22:55 Juiceman wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Matthew
>> Toseland wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 02 September 2009 00:10:36 Juiceman wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Matthew
>> >> Toseland
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot,
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>> ----
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Devl mailing list
>>>> Devl at freenetproject.org
>>>> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
-- next part --
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: location.log.txt
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090902/aa496b9a/attachment.txt>
ttp://freenetproject.org/22c3vid.html
> >
> >> Thanks a lot,
> >>
> >> Michael
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090902/f19eab61/attachment.pgp>
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 September 2009 20:21:02 Michael Yip wrote:
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> Attached is my locations file.
>>
>> I've been running an experiment of a small Darknet of 4 nodes and my
>> node has 3 peers. They were not fully interconnected.
>
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 September 2009 01:22:55 Juiceman wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Matthew
>> Toseland wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 02 September 2009 00:10:36 Juiceman wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Matthew
>> >> Toseland
So that means that if one of my peers restarts, location swapping would
occur and as a result, the location of my node may change to avoid any
collision?
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 September 2009 15:57:09 Michael Yip wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Can someone explain to me what i
ch they are pushed. IMHO we should make this theme the
> default after merging web-pushing.
> >
> > Thanks for reading & for your replies.
>
The new theme is still broken for me and presumably for other debian stable
(iceweasel 3.0.6) users:
http://amphibian.dyndns.org/snapshot23.png
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090902/2913a0bb/attachment.pgp>
cation/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090902/940dbea1/attachment.pgp>
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 September 2009 20:21:02 Michael Yip wrote:
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> Attached is my locations file.
>>
>> I've been running an experiment of a small Darknet of 4 nodes and my
>> node has 3 peers. They were not fully interconnected.
>
Hi guys,
Can someone explain to me what is logged in the file locations.log.txt?
Here's my guess. It logs the location changes of my node and this
prevents my node from specializing in storing a subset of the keyspace?
I'm guessing this only happens in Darknet as it would decrease
performance...
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 20:21:02 Michael Yip wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Attached is my locations file.
>
> I've been running an experiment of a small Darknet of 4 nodes and my
> node has 3 peers. They were not fully interconnected.
>
> A peer of mine sends 1000 requests and one of the 3 nodes
looks like you uploaded the same version again. Could you redo it please?
Argh, done. Please check!
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090902/2739e215/attachment.pgp>
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Michael Yip wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Can someone explain to me what is logged in the file locations.log.txt?
>
> Here's my guess. It logs the location changes of my node and this
> prevents my node from specializing in storing a subset of the keyspace?
> I'm guessing t
Hi Matt,
Attached is my locations file.
I've been running an experiment of a small Darknet of 4 nodes and my
node has 3 peers. They were not fully interconnected.
A peer of mine sends 1000 requests and one of the 3 nodes (including
mine, randomly chosen) was restarted after every 10 requests
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 18:40:21 Michael Yip wrote:
> So that means that if one of my peers restarts, location swapping would
> occur and as a result, the location of my node may change to avoid any
> collision?
No, not usually.
>
>
>
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 Septe
ntly. What sort of insert?
>
> Any Idea ?
>
> sich
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Can we always get the CHK keys from one file without inserting this file ?
When I use ClientPut and GetCHKOnly=true I have no return...
But with GetCHKOnly=false there is no problem...
Any Idea ?
sich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: G
So that means that if one of my peers restarts, location swapping would
occur and as a result, the location of my node may change to avoid any
collision?
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 September 2009 15:57:09 Michael Yip wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Can someone explain to me what i
On Saturday 29 August 2009 20:00:09 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 27 August 2009 16:48:58 Artefact2 wrote:
> > Hello there,
> >
> > I've been working lately on some interface changes. As suggested
> > previously by toad, we now have a status bar in all themes.
> >
> > So what is it ? It'
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Michael Yip wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Can someone explain to me what is logged in the file locations.log.txt?
>
> Here's my guess. It logs the location changes of my node and this
> prevents my node from specializing in storing a subset of the keyspace?
> I'm guessing t
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 15:57:09 Michael Yip wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Can someone explain to me what is logged in the file locations.log.txt?
>
> Here's my guess. It logs the location changes of my node and this
> prevents my node from specializing in storing a subset of the keyspace?
> I'm g
Hi guys,
Can someone explain to me what is logged in the file locations.log.txt?
Here's my guess. It logs the location changes of my node and this
prevents my node from specializing in storing a subset of the keyspace?
I'm guessing this only happens in Darknet as it would decrease
performance...
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 01:22:55 Juiceman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Matthew
> Toseland wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 September 2009 00:10:36 Juiceman wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Matthew
> >> Toseland wrote:
> >> > On Monday 31 August 2009 23:37:40 Juiceman wrote:
request
queue.
> - Transfers are shown on the downloads/uploads pages???
Yes. Files being sent to friends are shown at the uploads page. Files
being received by friends are shown at the downloads page.
> - If a peer goes offline, we try the transfer again from the beginning when
> they reconnect???
> - If we restart, we try the transfer again from the beginning after restart???
There is no such functionality at the moment. If one of the users
disconnect the file transfer fails and it can't be restarted. There
should be a way to resume files automatically when a user reconnects.
>
> Is there any good reason not to persist offers we have made that have not yet
> been persisted, and offers we have received that the user has not yet
> accepted?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090902/39a2121f/attachment.pgp>
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 10:30:47 sich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can we always get the CHK keys from one file without inserting this file ?
>
> When I use ClientPut and GetCHKOnly=true I have no return...
> But with GetCHKOnly=false there is no problem...
Worked for me recently. What sort of ins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Can we always get the CHK keys from one file without inserting this file ?
When I use ClientPut and GetCHKOnly=true I have no return...
But with GetCHKOnly=false there is no problem...
Any Idea ?
sich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: G
deployed update-new.cmd is broken, please release this new one I just
> committed ASAP.
>
> Sorry, I was concentrating on making sure the wrapper sections were
> good and I didn't see this.
Done.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Nam
28 matches
Mail list logo
