[freenet-dev] Web-pushing very important for 0.8.0?

2009-11-22 Thread sashee
Hello folks I've been busy with my final thesis as you've probably noticed and couldn't make progress to fix and stabilize the web-pushing functionality. The #1 problem with it is that it has became a maintenance nightmare to keep the branch up-to-date. Every few change makes conflicts and after s

[freenet-dev] BaseManifestPutter change in b9dc154d4ac3556824b1794d4de7aab411c1d30b

2009-11-22 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Is it always non-null *in all derived classes*? /metas/ is a *local* variable, and it is set to /null/ just one line before the /if/: line 1568: ArrayList metas = null; line 1569: if(metas != null) { > > diff --git a/sr

[freenet-dev] Web-pushing very important for 0.8.0?

2009-11-22 Thread Evan Daniel
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:51 AM, sashee wrote: > The XHTML support is still broke, and most likely will be in the > future, as folks at GWT thinks it is low priority ( > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=710 ). As > the XHTML standard is considered low-priority at W3C

Re: [freenet-dev] Web-pushing very important for 0.8.0?

2009-11-22 Thread Evan Daniel
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:51 AM, sashee wrote: > The XHTML support is still broke, and most likely will be in the > future, as folks at GWT thinks it is low priority ( > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=710 ). As > the XHTML standard is considered low-priority at W3C

Re: [freenet-dev] Web-pushing very important for 0.8.0?

2009-11-22 Thread sashee
Hello folks I've been busy with my final thesis as you've probably noticed and couldn't make progress to fix and stabilize the web-pushing functionality. The #1 problem with it is that it has became a maintenance nightmare to keep the branch up-to-date. Every few change makes conflicts and after s