the user's browser and the content. whatever decentralization and
encryption tricks unhosted could do inside the browser, can be done much
more effectively in the freenet node.
also, i guess freenet already solve the issues that unhosted could solve
(freedom from monopolies).
does that make any sense?
Cheers
Michiel
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110301/bc7f59c9/attachment.html>
Hi Matthew,
Sorry to take so long to reply, it's been a bit hectic for me these days.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Okay, we've clearly gone off in different directions.
>
>
not necessarily, i think i just didn't fully understand what you were
proposing, which made
