[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1366

- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110422/065b6f83/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] [GSoC 2011] Idea : Porting to Apache Struts

On Di, 2011-04-19 at 19:35 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Plus, ideally we'd like Freenet to support multiple logins. I?m not quite sure what you mean: Sone already does support multiple logins and I am using Fred?s session handling. David

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1366

Freenet 0.7.5 build 1366 is now available. This is mandatory in a week (the 28th), because one of the bugs fixed might be exploited for a weak censorship attack. Build 1367 will be released early next week with a new mechanism called RecentlyFailed, which has been planned for years, and should

[freenet-dev] One possibility to make Freetalk anonymous

-- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110422/459c4957/attachment.pgp>

Re: [freenet-dev] [GSoC 2011] Idea : Porting to Apache Struts

On Di, 2011-04-19 at 19:35 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Plus, ideally we'd like Freenet to support multiple logins. I’m not quite sure what you mean: Sone already does support multiple logins and I am using Fred’s session handling. David

Re: [freenet-dev] One possibility to make Freetalk anonymous

On Sunday 10 April 2011 19:25:53 Volodya wrote: > On 04/10/2011 08:56 PM, xor wrote: > > On Sunday 10 April 2011 10:57:45 Volodya wrote: > >> I am likely missing something trivial here, but hopefully the community > >> will find what i wrote interesting. > > > > People could just create single-use