On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Kieran Donegan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a second year BSc Computer Science student in University College Cork,
> Ireland. Freenet's development goals really resonate with me and I'd love
> to help enhance Freenet for GSoC this year. My Java skills are excellent
> and I
Hi,
I'm a second year BSc Computer Science student in University College Cork,
Ireland. Freenet's development goals really resonate with me and I'd love
to help enhance Freenet for GSoC this year. My Java skills are excellent
and I have a good knowledge of application layer and transport layer
net
On Tuesday 13 Mar 2012 16:50:17 Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 11 Mar 2012 22:07:08 Nicolas Hernandez wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > after lots of internal fights the choice is made. Let's go for GWT.
> >
> > This will cost us a lar
next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120313/dccdc1d4/attachment.html>
they are held hostage by a vocal
minority of their existing user base who resist any change.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
Personal blog: http://blog.locut.us/
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120313/1040067d/attachment.html>
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Sunday 11 Mar 2012 22:07:08 Nicolas Hernandez wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > after lots of internal fights the choice is made. Let's go for GWT.
>
> This will cost us a large proportion of our core userbase. Alienating your
> core users is
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Last time I asked, just about everyone actively using FMS who commented on
> the matter was of the view that for Freenet to *require* javascript would
> be utterly unacceptable.
>
Yes, when you ask people "how would you feel about being
