> On Mar 24, 2013 1:31 PM, "Matthew Toseland"
wrote:
> > However we won't see the full story until it's mandatory anyway?
I'm not sure whether that's relevant. At some point I can start gathering
build number probes for a source of information on update propagation in
addition to digger3's seed n
On Sunday 24 Mar 2013 01:00:31 Steve Dougherty wrote:
> On 03/23/2013 07:42 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Yes, if we're just talking about autodetecting via UPnP, that's
> > fine.
>
> Yes, that's what I mean.
>
> >> * Omit the list of common Internet connection speeds for the
> >> reasons menti
On Sunday 24 Mar 2013 14:23:32 Steve Dougherty wrote:
> The t-test part of the results I linked in IRC is not valid. I forgot about
> the condition that the population be normally distributed, and the reject
> percentage distribution plot on the stats page shows that it is not. The
> means are stil
The t-test part of the results I linked in IRC is not valid. I forgot about
the condition that the population be normally distributed, and the reject
percentage distribution plot on the stats page shows that it is not. The
means are still valid. If there were an equivalent probe with an
identifier,
