I'm not 100% sure how this might work, but having opennet require a security
device might be publicly acceptable, and might also serve as the monetary
disincentive to an opennet sybil attack.
Without looking too much into it, I supporting a smartcard interface from java
(across many
On 2013/07/21 (Jul), at 1:55 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Would you pay to join opennet? Bear in mind that a paid system could have an
> interesting level of security - not quite up to that of a real darknet, but
> most attacks would be *far* more expensive.
What an intriguing question!
Eleriseth has left, with a rant explaining his view of what our priorities
should be: Fixing usability issues, securing opennet, and THEN working on
darknet.
I've always taken the view that securing opennet is impossible, but there is a
radical suggestion that might make it possible, and help
Various of the ideas for fixing Freenet that I regard as most important.
Includes some controverisal stuff re opennet. Please have a look and
contribute...
http://piratepad.net/TQYpA3SDu7
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Would you pay to join opennet? Bear in mind that a paid system could have an
interesting level of security - not quite up to that of a real darknet, but
most attacks would be *far* more expensive.
When I say pay, I mean pay once, to create a node. You can then stay on opennet
for as long as
On Sunday 21 Jul 2013 19:55:53 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Would you pay to join opennet? Bear in mind that a paid system could have an
interesting level of security - not quite up to that of a real darknet, but
most attacks would be *far* more expensive.
When I say pay, I mean pay once, to
