I answered out-of-band (in german):
- freenet-sticks with direct posting-ability
- DoS can currently keep out new users
- people want to switch IDs monthly or so.
Am Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2014, 18:18:09 schrieb xor:
> That is a whole lot of text, thank you :)
>
> I stopped half-way reading it due t
On 07/30/2014 10:46 AM, Ximin Luo wrote:
> +devl@
>
> On 29/07/14 23:03, xor wrote:
>> (re-sent because mail bounced from infinity0's GMX address)
>>
>> On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 11:10:17 AM Ximin Luo wrote:
>>> +nextgens
>>>
>>> Re-reading through the IRC logs from last night apparently there'
+devl@
On 29/07/14 23:03, xor wrote:
> (re-sent because mail bounced from infinity0's GMX address)
>
> On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 11:10:17 AM Ximin Luo wrote:
>> +nextgens
>>
>> Re-reading through the IRC logs from last night apparently there's this:
>>
>> https://javadoc.freenetproject.org/
>>
On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 11:25:07 AM Matthew Toseland wrote:
> but we need our connection level crypto to be
> written in C, because you can't eliminate side-channels if you're doing
> encryption in Java.
I think that's tinfoil hat level of paranoia. If you're that close to a
Freenet user that
The recent Tor announcement is interesting. Some points:
1. Real Sybil attacks often do use a single IP range.
=> It's worth detecting and/or deterring this sort of thing, i.e. using
IP scarcity on some level. Provided that it's not ridiculously hard.
Here there is significant interaction between