Re: [freenet-dev] Coding Standard

2014-11-01 Thread Juiceman
It also looks like Google and Sun are mostly the same but designating 'Google' does give us one standard to reference which I like. That said, Google calls out 2 space indents. Makes it easier to format the code, but harder to read. Thoughts? On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Juiceman wrote: > T

Re: [freenet-dev] Coding Standard

2014-11-01 Thread Juiceman
The tool I am using to convert all the source in a repository is Jindent which also has the option to sort classes and interfaces, etc. On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 7:00 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: > Hi there, > > initiated by a change in a pull request[1] the issue of coding style (or > coding sta

Re: [freenet-dev] Coding Standard

2014-11-01 Thread Steve Dougherty
On 11/01/2014 07:00 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: ... > I’m not a big fan of these single large commits that reformat all > source code at once. As Google’s style guide mandates a little bit > more than just whitespace and bracket position (e.g. that overloaded > methods/constructors must not be i

[freenet-dev] Coding Standard

2014-11-01 Thread David ‘Bombe’ Roden
Hi there, initiated by a change in a pull request[1] the issue of coding style (or coding standard) popped up, once again. Instead of inventing our own coding style I proposed on IRC that we used either SUN’s Code Conventions[2] or Google’s Java Style[3]. Now that I’ve looked for the URL I wou