On 2016-12-17 19:01, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
ban...@openmailbox.org writes:
On 2016-12-16 22:06, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
ban...@openmailbox.org writes:
There is a way to route connections over Tor, but it isn’t tested
regularly and currently only works in friend-to-friend mode. For
d
On 2016-12-17 12:59, Florent Daigniere wrote:
On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 19:13 +0100, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Hi. Whonix [0] dev here.
We are looking for a censorship-resistant and decentralized way to
communicate notifications about critical situations [1] to our users
and
host the project
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 4:18 PM, Florent Daigniere nextg...@freenetproject.org
wrote:
On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 10:44 -0800, Dan Roberts wrote:
> It is my impression that retaining our transifex translations is a
> requirement.
I don't think so (we are supposed to re-write/de-clutter the content!);
On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 10:44 -0800, Dan Roberts wrote:
> It is my impression that retaining our transifex translations is a
> requirement.
I don't think so (we are supposed to re-write/de-clutter the content!);
and even if it was, I think that you are going the wrong way about it.
Transifex suppor
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 10:36 AM, Florent Daigniere
> nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 16:11 +, Ian Clarke wrote:
>>
>> > Weren't we going to host on AWS?
>>
>>
>> I don't know, that's why I am asking...
>>
>
> Dan
ban...@openmailbox.org writes:
> On 2016-12-16 22:06, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> ban...@openmailbox.org writes:
>> There is a way to route connections over Tor, but it isn’t tested
>> regularly and currently only works in friend-to-friend mode. For
>> details
>> see:
>> http://127.0.0.1:888
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 10:36 AM, Florent Daigniere nextg...@freenetproject.org
wrote:
On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 16:11 +, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Weren't we going to host on AWS?
I don't know, that's why I am asking...
Dan? I think your input is required here.
I have suggested either hugo or pel
On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 16:11 +, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Weren't we going to host on AWS?
I don't know, that's why I am asking...
I have suggested either hugo or pelican with AWS lambda (for a
completely serverless, trendy infrastructure)
OR
using github-pages (with jekyll) and putting some CDN in
Weren't we going to host on AWS?
What is the problem with maintaining a Ruby stack exactly? Isn't it just a
question of installing whatever is required for Jekyll and perhaps upgrading it
once in a blue moon? Isn't it just a question of:
$ sudo apt get install rubygems$ gem install jekyll bundler
On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 19:13 +0100, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Hi. Whonix [0] dev here.
>
> We are looking for a censorship-resistant and decentralized way to
> communicate notifications about critical situations [1] to our users
> and
> host the project metadata and files themselves to resi
So what is the plan for hosting if github pages can't do it?
As I wrote before, expecting release managers to maintain a ruby stack
(on top of the existing java/python one) is a no-go.
Florent
On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 01:27 -0800, Dan Roberts wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Status update. The simple je
Hi Folks,
Status update. The simple jekyll plugin I wrote works, with a couple of
known issues. It will allow us to use our existing transifex translations
unmodified (something I don't think we were going to get out-of-the-box
anywhere). It depends on the ruby gettext gem. The site still need
12 matches
Mail list logo
