Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture

2017-09-03 Thread Matthew John Toseland
On 03/09/17 21:01, Matthew John Toseland wrote: > On 03/09/17 20:53, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Hi toad, >> >> Matthew John Toseland writes: >>> Thoughts? I'm not a dev any more, but thinking about Bitcoin and other >>> stuff maybe there are some ways forward that we've missed... >>> >>> Disp

Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture

2017-09-03 Thread Matthew John Toseland
On 03/09/17 20:53, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Hi toad, > > Matthew John Toseland writes: >> Thoughts? I'm not a dev any more, but thinking about Bitcoin and other >> stuff maybe there are some ways forward that we've missed... >> >> Dispute resolution, spam and distributed data structures >>

Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture

2017-09-03 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Hi toad, Matthew John Toseland writes: > Thoughts? I'm not a dev any more, but thinking about Bitcoin and other > stuff maybe there are some ways forward that we've missed... > > Dispute resolution, spam and distributed data structures > >

Re: manifest files and forwarding

2017-09-03 Thread Matthew John Toseland
Yes, this was proposed years ago and is in the bug tracker. It's usually called "bundles" and is regarded as a poor man's tunneling system, in that it doesn't actually tunnel but maintains many of the advantages of tunnels. There are performance problems with it, especially with the current load l

Re: Some ideas on Freenet architecture

2017-09-03 Thread Matthew John Toseland
On 03/09/17 18:31, Matthew John Toseland wrote: > Thoughts? I'm not a dev any more, but thinking about Bitcoin and other > stuff maybe there are some ways forward that we've missed... > > Dispute resolution, spam and distributed data structures > ---

Re: Freenet on Embedded Systems

2017-09-03 Thread Matthew John Toseland
On 03/09/17 18:36, Matthew John Toseland wrote: > On 23/08/17 19:57, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I think such a device would be awesome! If combined with the icicles >> app, it could make using darknet very convenient. >> >> This could also serve as darknet peer to a node which runs o

Re: Freenet on Embedded Systems

2017-09-03 Thread Matthew John Toseland
On 23/08/17 19:57, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Hi, > > I think such a device would be awesome! If combined with the icicles > app, it could make using darknet very convenient. > > This could also serve as darknet peer to a node which runs on another > computer. Agreed! For any sort of darknet

Some ideas on Freenet architecture

2017-09-03 Thread Matthew John Toseland
Thoughts? I'm not a dev any more, but thinking about Bitcoin and other stuff maybe there are some ways forward that we've missed... Dispute resolution, spam and distributed data structures A key is disputable if: 1) It is an SSK or similar