Re: [freenet-dev] Interesting statistics and anecdotes

2003-11-04 Thread Daves Lists
- Original Message - From: "Toad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of development issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:21 AM Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Interesting statistics and anecdotes On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 02:

Re: [freenet-dev] Usability improvement ideas

2003-11-04 Thread Daves Lists
Always active jobs. Here's what I generally look like once the node has been up and running a few hours. I tried bringing the threads up to support the connections but that always seemed to cause the node to slow down and then I would reject on routing time or messagesendtime. Total pooled threads

Re: [freenet-dev] Interesting statistics and anecdotes

2003-11-04 Thread Daves Lists
4/03 1:00:00 AM EST 17500 10861 0.6206285714285714 (62%) Dave - Original Message - From: "Ken Corson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of development issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:54 AM Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Interest

Re: [freenet-dev] Interesting statistics and anecdotes

2003-11-03 Thread Daves Lists
I just replied to the Usability improvement ideas thread on this before I noticed this thread. All 4 of my nodes reject for the same reason. They don't like the default config. I had to reduce the max connections down to 256 and raise the threads to around 300. Thats the only way I can stop it reje

Re: [freenet-dev] Usability improvement ideas

2003-11-03 Thread Daves Lists
One thing I've noticed is that the default config seems to overload on lower end CPU's. The 4 machines I've installed(750 Duron, 1g athlon, 2xPIII750, 4xPIIXEON450) all QR about 80% of the requests. If I drop the max connections to 256 and increase the threads to 300 I only QR about 20% of the time