[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19544 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-25 00:03:17]: > On Thursday 24 April 2008 17:19, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-04-24 16:19:07 + (Thu, 24 Apr 2008) > > New Revision: 19544 > > > > Modified: > >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/FECCodec.java > > Log:

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19544 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-25 00:03:17]: On Thursday 24 April 2008 17:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-04-24 16:19:07 + (Thu, 24 Apr 2008) New Revision: 19544 Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/FECCodec.java Log:

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19547 - tags

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-24 18:00:12]: Author: toad Date: 2008-04-24 18:00:12 + (Thu, 24 Apr 2008) New Revision: 19547 Added: tags/freenet-0.7.0-rc2/ Log: Tag 0.7.0-rc2 Copied: tags/freenet-0.7.0-rc2 (from rev 19539, trunk) Heh! Why did you tag trunk

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19547 - tags

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-25 13:44:37]: On Friday 25 April 2008 11:03, Florent Daignière wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-24 18:00:12]: Author: toad Date: 2008-04-24 18:00:12 + (Thu, 24 Apr 2008) New Revision: 19547 Added

[freenet-dev] HACKontest

Hi, I've just registered Freenet on hackontest.org (http://hackontest.org/index.php?action=Root-projectDetail%2846%29). Some of you might be interested in posting feature requests there too ;) From their website: " About Hackontest Hackontest is a 24 hour

[freenet-dev] HACKontest

Hi, I've just registered Freenet on hackontest.org (http://hackontest.org/index.php?action=Root-projectDetail%2846%29). Some of you might be interested in posting feature requests there too ;) From their website: About Hackontest Hackontest is a 24 hour

[freenet-dev] French translation update

* Daniel Cheng [2008-04-20 21:54:36]: > On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 6:37 AM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > On Saturday 19 April 2008 18:14, Julien Cornuwel wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > It's for #1141. > > > > Committed. Thanks. > > r19451 > You have French

Re: [freenet-dev] French translation update

* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-20 21:54:36]: On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 6:37 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 19 April 2008 18:14, Julien Cornuwel wrote: Hi, It's for #1141. Committed. Thanks. r19451 You have French translation in English

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19372 - in trunk/apps/thingamablog/src/net/sf/thingamablog: blog generator

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-16 22:33:26]: > Relative links don't work? > Flogs might contain links which can't be relative... like the "bookmark me!" one. > On Wednesday 16 April 2008 18:40, dieppe at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: dieppe > > Date: 2008-04-16 17:40:18 + (Wed, 16

[freenet-dev] Patch: Report CHKs of single blocks in SimpleProgress

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-15 18:06:02]: > Is it better to report actual CHKs, or block numbers? Maybe we should do > both? > We would only need block numbers for selective reinsertion (the next logical > step), although there isn't really any good reason not to report CHKs. > Heh... are

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19304 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: client/async keys node support

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-14 23:05:22]: > On Monday 14 April 2008 07:21, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-04-14 06:21:05 + (Mon, 14 Apr 2008) > > New Revision: 19304 > > > > Modified: > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19299 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-14 22:39:41]: > On Monday 14 April 2008 05:18, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-04-14 04:18:17 + (Mon, 14 Apr 2008) > > New Revision: 19299 > > > > Modified: > >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/FailureTable.java > > Log:

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19291 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/keys

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-14 22:31:50]: > On Monday 14 April 2008 03:44, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-04-14 02:44:11 + (Mon, 14 Apr 2008) > > New Revision: 19291 > > > > Modified: > >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/keys/FreenetURI.java > > Log: >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19303 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: keys node

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-14 22:49:22]: > On Monday 14 April 2008 06:28, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-04-14 05:28:57 + (Mon, 14 Apr 2008) > > New Revision: 19303 > > > > Modified: > >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/keys/ClientCHKBlock.java > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19298 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: node store support/io

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-14 22:35:50]: > These are all ambiguous. Please use 120L * sleepTime etc. > Done in r19341 > On Monday 14 April 2008 05:09, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-04-14 04:09:28 + (Mon, 14 Apr 2008) > > New Revision: 19298 > >

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19291 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/keys

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-14 22:31:50]: On Monday 14 April 2008 03:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-04-14 02:44:11 + (Mon, 14 Apr 2008) New Revision: 19291 Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/keys/FreenetURI.java Log: doh...

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19299 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-14 22:39:41]: On Monday 14 April 2008 05:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-04-14 04:18:17 + (Mon, 14 Apr 2008) New Revision: 19299 Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/FailureTable.java Log: prevent

Re: [freenet-dev] Patch: Report CHKs of single blocks in SimpleProgress

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-15 18:06:02]: Is it better to report actual CHKs, or block numbers? Maybe we should do both? We would only need block numbers for selective reinsertion (the next logical step), although there isn't really any good reason not to report CHKs.

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19274 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/pluginmanager

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-14 18:44:14]: > Does this work? If emu is behaving badly the correct fix is for nextgens to > fix emu... What's bad with the current behaviour? As far as I know it works... and all I can see are some non argumented rants in comments. On top of being likely to be

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19304 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: client/async keys node support

* Daniel Cheng (SDiZ) [2008-04-14 15:09:45]: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Florent Daigni?re > wrote: > > * Daniel Cheng [2008-04-14 15:00:50]: > > > > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:21 PM, wrote: > > > > Author: nextgens > > > > Date: 2008-04-14 06:21:05

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19304 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: client/async keys node support

* Daniel Cheng [2008-04-14 15:00:50]: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:21 PM, wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-04-14 06:21:05 + (Mon, 14 Apr 2008) > > New Revision: 19304 > > > > Modified: > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19275 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: clients/http l10n pluginmanager

* dbkr at freenetproject.org [2008-04-13 23:42:00]: > Author: dbkr > Date: 2008-04-13 23:42:00 + (Sun, 13 Apr 2008) > New Revision: 19275 > > Added: >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/pluginmanager/FredPluginVersioned.java > Modified: >

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19304 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: client/async keys node support

* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-14 15:00:50]: On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-04-14 06:21:05 + (Mon, 14 Apr 2008) New Revision: 19304 Modified:

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19304 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: client/async keys node support

* Daniel Cheng (SDiZ) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-14 15:09:45]: On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-14 15:00:50]: On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19274 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/pluginmanager

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-14 18:44:14]: Does this work? If emu is behaving badly the correct fix is for nextgens to fix emu... What's bad with the current behaviour? As far as I know it works... and all I can see are some non argumented rants in comments. On top of being

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19298 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: node store support/io

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-14 22:35:50]: These are all ambiguous. Please use 120L * sleepTime etc. Done in r19341 On Monday 14 April 2008 05:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-04-14 04:09:28 + (Mon, 14 Apr 2008) New Revision: 19298

[freenet-dev] Code notification messages

* Julien Cornuwel [2008-04-13 11:45:43]: > Hi, > > Is it normal if I only receive answers to messages like : " > Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19178 - in trunk/freenet: > src/freenet/support test/freenet/support" ? > > I never get the original message. Is there an option to activate on the

Re: [freenet-dev] Code notification messages

* Julien Cornuwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-13 11:45:43]: Hi, Is it normal if I only receive answers to messages like : Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19178 - in trunk/freenet: src/freenet/support test/freenet/support ? I never get the original message. Is there an option to activate

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19275 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: clients/http l10n pluginmanager

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-13 23:42:00]: Author: dbkr Date: 2008-04-13 23:42:00 + (Sun, 13 Apr 2008) New Revision: 19275 Added: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/pluginmanager/FredPluginVersioned.java Modified:

[freenet-dev] Embedded build

* Sven-Ola T?cke [2008-04-09 06:57:37]: > Hi, > > Am Dienstag 08 April 2008 17:11:21 schrieben Sie: > [snip] > > > I got occasional oopses. Are those normal? > > > > You'll have to compile with line numbers (debugging info, -g) to get a > > meaningful stack trace. Then find out what it is that

[freenet-dev] Embedded build

* Sven-Ola T?cke [2008-04-06 22:50:13]: > Hi, > > detected a couple of unused bytes in libgcj. Initial memory consumption now > ~38Mb down to ~28 Mb. Telnet iface runs. Frost runs (to some extent). Changed > my > numbering scheme, so *.tgz now numbered to reflect the SVN revision. > > I

[freenet-dev] r19014 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

* Robert Hailey [2008-04-07 11:00:32]: > > On Apr 5, 2008, at 8:18 AM, toad at freenetproject.org wrote: > >> Author: toad >> Date: 2008-04-05 13:18:53 + (Sat, 05 Apr 2008) >> New Revision: 19014 >> >> Modified: >> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/SSKInsertSender.java >> Log: >> Synchronize

Re: [freenet-dev] Embedded build

* Sven-Ola Tücke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-06 22:50:13]: Hi, detected a couple of unused bytes in libgcj. Initial memory consumption now ~38Mb down to ~28 Mb. Telnet iface runs. Frost runs (to some extent). Changed my numbering scheme, so *.tgz now numbered to reflect the SVN revision.

Re: [freenet-dev] Embedded build

* Sven-Ola Tücke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-09 06:57:37]: Hi, Am Dienstag 08 April 2008 17:11:21 schrieben Sie: [snip] I got occasional oopses. Are those normal? You'll have to compile with line numbers (debugging info, -g) to get a meaningful stack trace. Then find out what it is

[freenet-dev] Frontpage layout

* bbackde at googlemail.com [2008-04-06 18:07:01]: > On the node homepage, the bookmarks are below the omnipresent opennet warning. > > Below the bookmarks I can find the more important boxes for current > activity, fetch freesite links and the node version. > My bookmarks are long, and I often

Re: [freenet-dev] r19014 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

* Robert Hailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-07 11:00:32]: On Apr 5, 2008, at 8:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: toad Date: 2008-04-05 13:18:53 + (Sat, 05 Apr 2008) New Revision: 19014 Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/SSKInsertSender.java Log: Synchronize on access

[freenet-dev] Installation bugs on a Mac, and some usability issues

* Ian Clarke [2008-04-06 07:57:46]: > Just installed using the webstart installer. Set the installation > path to /Users/ian/Applications/Freenet. Click "Yes" after the "The > directory already exists" warning. > > See the bars go by on the "Overall installation progress", it says its >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18966 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: crypt?support support/math

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-05 11:44:39]: > On Saturday 05 April 2008 03:34, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-04-04 19:09:01]: > > > > > On Friday 04 April 2008 06:20, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > > > Author: nextgens > > > > Date: 2008-04-04 05:20:31 +

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18966 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: crypt?support support/math

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-05 11:44:39]: On Saturday 05 April 2008 03:34, Florent Daignière wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-04 19:09:01]: On Friday 04 April 2008 06:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-04-04 05:20:31

Re: [freenet-dev] Installation bugs on a Mac, and some usability issues

* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-06 07:57:46]: Just installed using the webstart installer. Set the installation path to /Users/ian/Applications/Freenet. Click Yes after the The directory already exists warning. See the bars go by on the Overall installation progress, it says its

Re: [freenet-dev] Frontpage layout

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-06 18:07:01]: On the node homepage, the bookmarks are below the omnipresent opennet warning. Below the bookmarks I can find the more important boxes for current activity, fetch freesite links and the node version. My bookmarks are long, and I

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18968 -?trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-05 11:28:41]: > On Saturday 05 April 2008 04:13, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-04-04 19:12:05]: > > > > > On Friday 04 April 2008 06:25, you wrote: > > > > Author: nextgens > > > > Date: 2008-04-04 05:25:41 + (Fri, 04 Apr 2008) > > > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18968 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-05 11:24:42]: > On Saturday 05 April 2008 01:12, Daniel Cheng wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Matthew Toseland > > wrote: > > > On Friday 04 April 2008 06:25, you wrote: > > > > Author: nextgens > > > > Date: 2008-04-04 05:25:41 + (Fri, 04 Apr 2008) >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18969 -?trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/bookmark

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-05 11:22:48]: > On Saturday 05 April 2008 04:22, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-04-04 19:13:51]: > > > > > On Friday 04 April 2008 06:27, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > > > Author: nextgens > > > > Date: 2008-04-04 05:27:02 +

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18975 -?trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/async

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-05 11:11:05]: > On Saturday 05 April 2008 03:50, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-04-04 19:22:27]: > > > > > On Friday 04 April 2008 07:05, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > > > Author: nextgens > > > > Date: 2008-04-04 06:05:54 +

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18969 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/bookmark

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-04 19:13:51]: > On Friday 04 April 2008 06:27, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-04-04 05:27:02 + (Fri, 04 Apr 2008) > > New Revision: 18969 > > > > Modified: > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18968 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-04 19:12:05]: > On Friday 04 April 2008 06:25, you wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-04-04 05:25:41 + (Fri, 04 Apr 2008) > > New Revision: 18968 > > > > Modified: > >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt/DSAPublicKey.java > > Log: > > implement

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18975 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/async

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-04 19:22:27]: > On Friday 04 April 2008 07:05, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-04-04 06:05:54 + (Fri, 04 Apr 2008) > > New Revision: 18975 > > > > Modified: > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18977 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-04 19:26:56]: > G, indenting and sync fixes in the same commit. > Sorry about that one... Oh and btw, G, top-posting! > On Friday 04 April 2008 07:16, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-04-04 06:16:23 + (Fri, 04

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18971 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-04 19:17:44]: > On that path, it can't. pn can only be null in sendAnonAuthPacket. Please > revert. > Already done: r18973 | nextgens | 2008-04-04 07:53:39 +0200 (ven, 04 avr 2008) | 1 line

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18968 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-05 11:24:42]: On Saturday 05 April 2008 01:12, Daniel Cheng wrote: On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 04 April 2008 06:25, you wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-04-04 05:25:41 +

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18968 -?trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-05 11:28:41]: On Saturday 05 April 2008 04:13, Florent Daignière wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-04 19:12:05]: On Friday 04 April 2008 06:25, you wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-04-04 05:25:41 + (Fri, 04

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18971 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-04 19:17:44]: On that path, it can't. pn can only be null in sendAnonAuthPacket. Please revert. Already done: r18973 | nextgens | 2008-04-04 07:53:39 +0200 (ven, 04 avr

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18977 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-04 19:26:56]: G, indenting and sync fixes in the same commit. Sorry about that one... Oh and btw, G, top-posting! On Friday 04 April 2008 07:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-04-04 06:16:23 + (Fri, 04 Apr

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18975 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/async

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-04 19:22:27]: On Friday 04 April 2008 07:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-04-04 06:05:54 + (Fri, 04 Apr 2008) New Revision: 18975 Modified:

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18968 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-04 19:12:05]: On Friday 04 April 2008 06:25, you wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-04-04 05:25:41 + (Fri, 04 Apr 2008) New Revision: 18968 Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt/DSAPublicKey.java Log: implement

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18969 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/bookmark

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-04 19:13:51]: On Friday 04 April 2008 06:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-04-04 05:27:02 + (Fri, 04 Apr 2008) New Revision: 18969 Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/bookmark/BookmarkItem.java

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18938 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/transport/ip

* nextgens at freenetproject.org [2008-04-03 07:33:00]: > Author: nextgens > Date: 2008-04-03 07:33:00 + (Thu, 03 Apr 2008) > New Revision: 18938 > > Modified: >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/transport/ip/IPAddressDetector.java > Log: > fix the build, add a FIXME, fix a bug (we

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18938 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/transport/ip

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-03 07:33:00]: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-04-03 07:33:00 + (Thu, 03 Apr 2008) New Revision: 18938 Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/transport/ip/IPAddressDetector.java Log: fix the build, add a FIXME, fix a bug (we weren't

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18864 - in trunk/apps/new_installer: . res/unix/bin

* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-31 21:48:18]: > Does the new mac startup script work? > Dunno, I can't test it... but previous version didn't work anyway :) > On Monday 31 March 2008 12:40, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-03-31 11:40:58 + (Mon, 31 Mar

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18864 - in trunk/apps/new_installer: . res/unix/bin

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-31 21:48:18]: Does the new mac startup script work? Dunno, I can't test it... but previous version didn't work anyway :) On Monday 31 March 2008 12:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-03-31 11:40:58 + (Mon, 31 Mar

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18802 - in trunk/apps/new_installer/res: unix/bin windows

* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-28 12:17:23]: > On Friday 28 March 2008 04:17, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-03-28 04:17:24 + (Fri, 28 Mar 2008) > > New Revision: 18802 > > > > Modified: > >trunk/apps/new_installer/res/unix/bin/browse.sh > >

[freenet-dev] High-latency navigation [was: Help!!!!!]

* Obey Arthur Liu [2008-03-28 02:04:50]: > Matthew Toseland a ?crit : > > On Wednesday 26 March 2008 10:42, Jano wrote: > >> > >> This plus a torbutton-like extension would be nice. > >> > > What would you suggest that any such extension would do? > > > Hijack ahead. > > I read the

[freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* David Sowder [2008-03-27 07:32:30]: > Florent Daigni?re wrote: >> * David Sowder (Zothar) [2008-03-25 >> 19:13:13]: >> >>> On approach, at least to avoid the stats page not returning after >>> starting the loading of 10 freesites on separate tabs, might be to >>> separate the node

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18802 - in trunk/apps/new_installer/res: unix/bin windows

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-28 12:17:23]: On Friday 28 March 2008 04:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-03-28 04:17:24 + (Fri, 28 Mar 2008) New Revision: 18802 Modified: trunk/apps/new_installer/res/unix/bin/browse.sh

[freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* Joel C. Salomon [2008-03-26 22:32:27]: > Can a Firefox plugin be made smart enough so it only affects the > latency setting for one site? (Namely 127.0.0.1: -- > customizable to whatever's on the user's machine.) I don't think so; that would involve patching firefox itself. We could

[freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* Juiceman [2008-03-26 21:51:06]: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Florent Daigni?re > wrote: > > * Juiceman [2008-03-26 20:56:46]: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Matthew Toseland > > > wrote: > > > > Okay, having investigated this, I'm fairly confident of the current

[freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* Michael Rogers [2008-03-26 09:36:32]: > On Mar 25 2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: > >Anyone got any better ideas? > > Sorry if this would be impossible, I don't know anything about fproxy's > internals, but when a key is requested, would it be possible to display a > "please wait" page with a

[freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* Juiceman [2008-03-26 20:56:46]: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > Okay, having investigated this, I'm fairly confident of the current theory: > > - If a copy of Firefox is already running with the default profile, and we > > launch a copy with our profile

Re: [freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* David Sowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-27 07:32:30]: Florent Daignière wrote: * David Sowder (Zothar) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-25 19:13:13]: On approach, at least to avoid the stats page not returning after starting the loading of 10 freesites on separate tabs, might

Re: [freenet-dev] High-latency navigation [was: Help!!!!!]

* Obey Arthur Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-28 02:04:50]: Matthew Toseland a écrit : On Wednesday 26 March 2008 10:42, Jano wrote: This plus a torbutton-like extension would be nice. What would you suggest that any such extension would do? Hijack ahead. I read the thread

[freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-25 20:36:43]: > Okay, having investigated this, I'm fairly confident of the current theory: > - If a copy of Firefox is already running with the default profile, and we > launch a copy with our profile (-no-remote -P ), everything > works fine (as long as our copy

[freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-25 19:41:59]: > Sorry, I'm the idiot who decided to create a firefox profile. I was simply > trying to avoid some major performance issues we have because the default > settings are not good for Freenet, and asking users to change them globally > also sucks. > >

[freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* ghoul at hushmail.com [2008-03-25 19:34:54]: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Do you think that the following plugin for FF could be tweaked for > Freenet's use? > Torbutton (https://torbutton.torproject.org/dev/) > > snip* > Torbutton is a 1-click way for Firefox users

[freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* David Sowder (Zothar) [2008-03-25 19:13:13]: > On approach, at least to avoid the stats page not returning after > starting the loading of 10 freesites on separate tabs, might be to > separate the node control/stats parts of FProxy from the key fetching > parts by placing one of the two on

Re: [freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* Juiceman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-26 20:56:46]: On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, having investigated this, I'm fairly confident of the current theory: - If a copy of Firefox is already running with the default profile, and we launch a

Re: [freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* Michael Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-26 09:36:32]: On Mar 25 2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: Anyone got any better ideas? Sorry if this would be impossible, I don't know anything about fproxy's internals, but when a key is requested, would it be possible to display a please wait

Re: [freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* Juiceman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-26 21:51:06]: On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Juiceman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-26 20:56:46]: On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, having

Re: [freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* Joel C. Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-26 22:32:27]: Can a Firefox plugin be made smart enough so it only affects the latency c. setting for one site? (Namely 127.0.0.1: -- customizable to whatever's on the user's machine.) I don't think so; that would involve patching firefox

[freenet-dev] Cross compiling - small issues you may want to correct

* Sven-Ola T?cke [2008-03-23 16:23:37]: > Hey, > > mips & mipsel support are completed now. I've upgraded readme.txt and added a > couple of tweaks to the cross-compile makefile. Here are some issues I've > stubled across while doing that: > > * There's a (superflous?)

[freenet-dev] Recent flood on @cvs

Hi, Sorry for the recent "indent-verification" flood on the commit mailing list... It's my bad and should hopefully be fixed now. NextGen$ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189

Re: [freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* David Sowder (Zothar) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-25 19:13:13]: On approach, at least to avoid the stats page not returning after starting the loading of 10 freesites on separate tabs, might be to separate the node control/stats parts of FProxy from the key fetching parts by placing one

Re: [freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-25 19:34:54]: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Do you think that the following plugin for FF could be tweaked for Freenet's use? Torbutton (https://torbutton.torproject.org/dev/) snip* Torbutton is a 1-click way for Firefox

Re: [freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-25 19:41:59]: Sorry, I'm the idiot who decided to create a firefox profile. I was simply trying to avoid some major performance issues we have because the default settings are not good for Freenet, and asking users to change them globally also

Re: [freenet-dev] Help!!!!!

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-25 20:36:43]: Okay, having investigated this, I'm fairly confident of the current theory: - If a copy of Firefox is already running with the default profile, and we launch a copy with our profile (-no-remote -P profile name), everything works

[freenet-dev] Recent flood on @cvs

Hi, Sorry for the recent indent-verification flood on the commit mailing list... It's my bad and should hopefully be fixed now. NextGen$ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org

Re: [freenet-dev] Cross compiling - small issues you may want to correct

* Sven-Ola Tücke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-23 16:23:37]: Hey, mips mipsel support are completed now. I've upgraded readme.txt and added a couple of tweaks to the cross-compile makefile. Here are some issues I've stubled across while doing that: * There's a (superflous?)

[freenet-dev] [GSoC] Packaging and setup process

* Joel C. Salomon [2008-03-23 13:04:52]: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 5:39 AM, Obey Arthur Liu > wrote: > > The issue here with maintainer scripts downloading the bulk of the > > software is that it's against Debian policy and against the purpose of > > packages. There are some exceptions but

Re: [freenet-dev] [GSoC] Packaging and setup process

* Joel C. Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-23 13:04:52]: On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 5:39 AM, Obey Arthur Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The issue here with maintainer scripts downloading the bulk of the software is that it's against Debian policy and against the purpose of packages. There

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18550 -?trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile

* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-19 11:56:29]: > On Wednesday 19 March 2008 01:06, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-03-18 18:10:54]: > > > > > On Sunday 16 March 2008 10:29, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > > > Author: nextgens > > > > Date: 2008-03-16 10:29:28 +

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18552 - in?trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile: . chrome

* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-19 11:55:30]: > On Wednesday 19 March 2008 00:56, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-03-18 18:12:39]: > > > > > On Sunday 16 March 2008 12:14, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > > > Author: nextgens > > > > Date: 2008-03-16 12:14:56 +

[freenet-dev] [GSoC] Packaging and setup process

* arthur at milliways.fr [2008-03-19 00:15:58]: > Hi, > > I'm a french student of computer science at ENSIMAG[1]. I am looking for > your feeling > on my proposal for working in your organization as part of the Google > Summer of Code. > > I have been using the Freenet software for various

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18550 - trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile

* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-18 18:10:54]: > On Sunday 16 March 2008 10:29, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-03-16 10:29:28 + (Sun, 16 Mar 2008) > > New Revision: 18550 > > > > Added: > >trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile/extensions.rdf

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18545 - trunk/apps/new_installer/res/windows

* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-18 18:15:42]: > The below has a hardcoded http://127.0.0.1:/ - does that mean it won't > work if fproxy is on another port? Top-posting sucks. No, we mangle the file in install_wrapper.cmd latter on when we have chosen which port we will use. > > On Sunday 16

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18552 - in trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile: . chrome

* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-18 18:12:39]: > On Sunday 16 March 2008 12:14, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-03-16 12:14:56 + (Sun, 16 Mar 2008) > > New Revision: 18552 > > > > Added: > >trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile/chrome/ > >

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18552 - in?trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile: . chrome

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-19 11:55:30]: On Wednesday 19 March 2008 00:56, Florent Daignière wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-18 18:12:39]: On Sunday 16 March 2008 12:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-03-16 12:14:56

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r18550 -?trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-19 11:56:29]: On Wednesday 19 March 2008 01:06, Florent Daignière wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-18 18:10:54]: On Sunday 16 March 2008 10:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-03-16 10:29:28

[freenet-dev] Adding a user for Freenet breaks startup-without-login

* Victor Denisov [2008-03-18 14:59:50]: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > |> I think that installer should at least ask if a dedicated user should be > |> created, and an option to use an existing account. I have... what... 4 > |> freenet users now on my system (yeah, I've

[freenet-dev] Adding a user for Freenet breaks startup-without-login

* Victor Denisov [2008-03-17 22:59:50]: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > | If it is standard practice for services to run as SYSTEM then we > | should probably do that too. We don't need to be spending our time > | and energy reinventing how to install software on Windows.

[freenet-dev] Adding a user for Freenet breaks startup-without-login

* Ian Clarke [2008-03-17 14:31:19]: > If it is standard practice for services to run as SYSTEM then we > should probably do that too. We don't need to be spending our time > and energy reinventing how to install software on Windows. > > Ian. That was my original view too but toad managed to

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >