Great to know it's ready for testing! If you write up some easy
instructions on installing the unstable build (or whatever reflects nio's
current state), I'm sure more folks will run it. I've never run an unstable
build, so I'm not sure what to do:
Do I just download
> > It's supposed to. If things get _really_ bad, RNFs can happen.
>
> Well, if things are really bad - then it is hawk's own fault for not
> dampening incoming requests effectively enough.
If things get really bad, the node should restart itself.
For example, a node that at one point had lots
> > YOUR NODE CAUSED THE HEISENBUG - PLEASE REPORT SETUP TO FREENET
> DEV MAILING LIST! (TYPE B)
> > PANIC! Just recreated heisenbug! ID: 19849bf519849bf5
>
> What JVM are you running, on what OS?
This pattern of conversation seems to happen a lot. Maybe the Heisenbug
message should just
YOUR NODE CAUSED THE HEISENBUG - PLEASE REPORT SETUP TO FREENET
DEV MAILING LIST! (TYPE B)
PANIC! Just recreated heisenbug! ID: 19849bf519849bf5
What JVM are you running, on what OS?
This pattern of conversation seems to happen a lot. Maybe the Heisenbug
message should just include JVM
Oh, and the other thing where someone commented that on the
majority of NATd
setups the NAT router would actually spot the destination IP
address as its
own and route the request locally instead of via the internet ...
well, that
wouldn't matter at all, surely?
That assertion was
Eerr, did you forget what I was originally commenting on?
I did. Sorry!
-glenn
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:02:26PM -0600, Glenn Crocker wrote:
I've restarted since my previous email, and haven't had any incoming
requests yet. globalRequestsPerHour: 2934.404255319149,
localRequestsPerHour: 0.0 right now. I'll play with this some
more and post
if I find anything
I just tried the new webinstaller on my win2k system, installing on top of a
very (6 months) old unused installation. Everything went well, defaults all
worked. When Freenet started and the icon appeared in my task bar, I moused
over it and saw Freenet is Running. Double-clicked and got an
I've got a clean install of 561 that has been running for 20 hours. I set
the announce delay to 3000 to speed things up, and have downloaded a bunch
of stuff. I haven't done any deliberate key insertions, but I think my FEC
download may have inserted missing blocks. I have 50 node references
My node has announcedTo Events=9, Value Change=20 (for the
day). I have a
lot of log entries like Announcement failed to a292 2a5a a443 18ea
b287 4f78 80bb 1642 050e at depth 2. And I have 49 incoming
key requests.
Have you seen ANY successful announcements?
Yes. Announced node
If your box is on a non-routable IP (192.168.*, 10.*, etc.) then
you can't run Freenet without manually forwarding at least one port
through the NAT firewall. There's obviously no way for the Windows
installer to do that.
Also, unless this has changed recently, you'll have to configure the
I just tried the new webinstaller on my win2k system, installing on top of a
very (6 months) old unused installation. Everything went well, defaults all
worked. When Freenet started and the icon appeared in my task bar, I moused
over it and saw Freenet is Running. Double-clicked and got an
I played with the Webinstaller some more, trying to install to a new folder
(instead of on top of my old Freenet folder). Win2k, IE.
I clicked the http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-webinstall.exe
URL, and ran it directly from there (I did not save it to disk first, just
ran it from
After downloading a FEC Segment, I get this message:
FEC decoding missing data blocks... this can take a long time. Be patient.
It sure would be nice if this gave some indication of how far done (%,
ideally, but any semi-useful changing number would be encouraging) it is
each time the page is
Sebastian,
Maybe if the default you choose has no dots in it (like the "timm" example
given), choose another default until you find one that has dots?
Allowing users to modify it is the right way to go, but if a "better
suggestion" can be found automatically, that'll help lots of folks.
-glenn
There's a 50-request-per-minute limit in the code as distributed. It's
pretty arbitrary (though it's based on giannij's testing), and my node with
the "other" limit algorithm (2/3s of max threads, I believe) is working
well.
-glenn
> -Original Message-
> From: devl-admin at
Tavin,
I'm THRILLED to see you've chased this down to this point. I've been adding
toString() methods to all kinds of classes trying to get a list of what all
those damned threads were up to, suspecting something like this was causing
my node to degrade similarly.
For what it's worth, my node
> Are you using the latest cvs?
No, I'm trying to tune some throughput stuff (3 10,000+ request hours so
far!), so I haven't updated in a couple of days.
> See: http://hawk.freenproject.org:8889/diagnostics/index.html
> for the current output format.
Sweet.
> > For an Excel (sorry, I am
Oskar,
I'd like to see the output more human-usable. The square column on the
time-based stats isn't terribly useful unless you're bringing it into a
spreadsheet or somesuch (or do very long division and square roots in your
head well ;-).
For an Excel (sorry, I am Satan) spreadsheet that
I've been watching those, and that range matches my stats.
-glenn
> -Original Message-
> From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org
> [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Tavin Cole
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:22 PM
> To: devl at freenetproject.org
> Subject:
20 matches
Mail list logo
