> Listen people: You cannot build a network to allow the free > publication of > information in a legal system where the free communication of > informationis considered a crime, and expect running that network > to be legal. > Period. No amount of maneuvering or loophole searching can better this > situation - either Freenet stops being free, society starts being > free, or > Freenet will be outlawed by society. Why do we have to have this > discussion again and again?
That is perfectly true, I still think it needs to be discussed what people should do when they receive a threatening letter of a company now. That`s why I would like to return to my first intention: "Providing a sample response to some lawyers who threaten people in the current situation where no court decisions made running Freenet illegal yet". I did not want to start the discussion whether we want or should enable blocking mechanisms, my intention is far more short sighted: Providing an immediate response which is as bullet proof as it gets in the current situation. Sebastian P.S. Sorry for using the off-topic devl list _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl
