signature=557158b22855dcd12d4e5bc673ad6cbc50467596,6546892da632103c3b89b
24764fcf41451abd2f
version=Fred,0.4,1.46,519
presentations=1
identity.g=930168de21e7fb66c0375e08e964255a0f7f0ad54507a51864afdc686f36b
e8bb8b786540811606
0c5f34f94b5146cbef9e4adb70324fba01d34c1c60817cbadf6854d654176cb391de0d41
signature=557158b22855dcd12d4e5bc673ad6cbc50467596,6546892da632103c3b89b
24764fcf41451abd2f
version=Fred,0.4,1.46,519
presentations=1
identity.g=930168de21e7fb66c0375e08e964255a0f7f0ad54507a51864afdc686f36b
e8bb8b786540811606
0c5f34f94b5146cbef9e4adb70324fba01d34c1c60817cbadf6854d654176cb391de0d41
This is just a user experience note: The installer currently has a full
screen blue backdrop, whereas modern installers are not supposed to have
this.
> -Original Message-
> From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org
[mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]
> On Behalf Of Mathew Ryden
> Sent:
This is just a user experience note: The installer currently has a full
screen blue backdrop, whereas modern installers are not supposed to have
this.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:devl-admin@;freenetproject.org]
> On Behalf Of Mathew Ryden
> Sent: Sunday, 20 Octob
Wouldn't everybody be happier if you gave them more time to think about
things? We all want 0.5 to come out, but what is the hurry?
Right now, we could decide on a date. The date can be one or two weeks
away, but it will be a fixed date. Everyone works towards that date, and
there are no surprise
Even if you are technically ready to release 0.5, I'd inform journalists at
least a week ahead of time. They need just as much time as you do.
> -Original Message-
> From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org
> [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Ian Clarke
> Sent: Saturday,
Wouldn't everybody be happier if you gave them more time to think about
things? We all want 0.5 to come out, but what is the hurry?
Right now, we could decide on a date. The date can be one or two weeks
away, but it will be a fixed date. Everyone works towards that date, and
there are no surprise
Even if you are technically ready to release 0.5, I'd inform journalists at
least a week ahead of time. They need just as much time as you do.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:devl-admin@;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Ian Clarke
> Sent: Saturday, 19 October, 2002
I'd be willing to maintain the windows installer. Tell me what I need to do.
-Wesley Leggette
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sebastian Spath
> Sent: Saturday, 05 October, 2002 03:20
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [freenet-d
I have complained about the html. Good job, Ian. It looks great.
> -Original Message-
> From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org
> [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Gianni Johansson
> Sent: Friday, 30 August, 2002 23:53
> To: devl at freenetproject.org
> Subject: Re: [fre
I have complained about the html. Good job, Ian. It looks great.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gianni Johansson
> Sent: Friday, 30 August, 2002 23:53
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Oskar won't like this...
>
>
This would work because requests would come to a firewalled system through
it's open connections?
Also, how are new node refs added to a running node, and where is the
documentation for that process? (If there is no docs, can someone tell me
how it works so I can write them?)
Thanks,
Wesley.
> -
This would work because requests would come to a firewalled system through
it's open connections?
Also, how are new node refs added to a running node, and where is the
documentation for that process? (If there is no docs, can someone tell me
how it works so I can write them?)
Thanks,
Wesley.
>
The people I've talked to seem to think that Freenet 0.3 works better than
0.4. Also, one person complained that the plugins for 0.3 stopped working
with 0.4, and they were never upgraded to the 0.4 API, or something like
that. Also, I heard something about how Freenet could be implemented with
mor
The people I've talked to seem to think that Freenet 0.3 works better than
0.4. Also, one person complained that the plugins for 0.3 stopped working
with 0.4, and they were never upgraded to the 0.4 API, or something like
that. Also, I heard something about how Freenet could be implemented with
mo
For this server, what kind of resources would be used? What kind of
bandwidth, montly transfer, CPU usage, RAM, and disk space would be taken up
by this watchme stuff?
Wesley Leggette.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ian Clarke
> What he's saying is "For some reason, it's taking 50-60 generally high
> end machines on dedicated connections to do the work of one 386-33 on a
> 9600 baud modem." Something is very broken, causing nodes to overload
> very quickly (and start timing out, thread loss, etc). A number of
> peo
>we try to make them work more gracefully - even under this bad condition.
we
>have not enough permanent nodes, but it should not be possible to stop
>freenet by overloading.
I'm don't want to imply that requests should be blocked or stopped to fix
the problem. But if requests were better rou
Another thing-
My node only attempts to connect to one or two other nodes for a request. Is
this a bad thing?
-Wesley
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
What exactly causes overloads on a specific node? Is it the time taken
sending data, or is it just handling all the failed requests? Would the
problem be lessened if there were not as many requests for data a node
doesn't have?
-Wesley
___
devl mai
20 matches
Mail list logo
