> A server by any other name would still use as much outgoing
> bandwidth. According to Friday's Wired online, Napster has now been
> banned by Cox at Home in San Diego because it is a de facto server.
> http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,35523,00.html.
>
> I don't think anyone calls Nap
> This ought be mentioned in the docs somewhere.
I added some notes on this in the troubleshooting section of the
installation document. I edited installation.inc in the website CVS,
I hope that was the correct to change.
___
Freenet-dev mailing lis
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> This ought be mentioned in the docs somewhere.
I'm writing this into the installation notes right now, and reading
the notes, something that disturbs me is that the Freenet Node is
being refered to a Freenet Server everywhere. Nodes are not servers,
t
The http streams used to read the initializing nodes addresses on the
web does not seem to run correctly under Kaffe. You still have the
option of initializing you Node with a couple of references by
copying addresses manually from the inform page to a file called
nodes.config in the Freenet direc
> I'm writing this into the installation notes right now, and reading
> the notes, something that disturbs me is that the Freenet Node is
> being refered to a Freenet Server everywhere. Nodes are not servers,
> they are nodes. Refering to it as a server is bad because:
>
> b) If they are servers th
After installing kaffe-1.0.5-3.i386.rpm, I ran freenet_server. The
output showed something like "SystemExemption" followed by a reference
to the inform.php site, among other things. Inserts failed, telling me
to set hte to a smaller value. When set to 1 (just local server) it
worked.
After much
