I fixed this now. Not that it matters as the testbed is fucked up anyways. I'll
try to fix it up in a while.
On Sat, 03 Jun 2000, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> No, it is a subclass of Freenet.node.Document, which is now known as
> Freenet.node.Entity.
>
> On Sat, 03 Jun 2000, Ian Clarke wrote:
> >
>
No, it is a subclass of Freenet.node.Document, which is now known as
Freenet.node.Entity.
On Sat, 03 Jun 2000, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> StringDocument was preventing a build because it couldn't find the Document
> class. I have now helped it out by importing the Freenet.client.* packa
Hi all,
StringDocument was preventing a build because it couldn't find the Document
class. I have now helped it out by importing the Freenet.client.* package
and it builds fine now, but was this the intention for this piece of code?
Ian.
-- next part --
A non-text attachm
I committed this fix now. I think the exception within the exception was hidden
enough that I can be excused from detention for causing this one (though of
course I had the brilliant idea of constructing the comment there (which is
never used elsewhere in the code) as well - but that was many mont
Thanks for that, I should have been more careful there.
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Paul Jimenez wrote:
> I started up a top of tree server and got a few of these:
>
> java.lang.NullPointerException:
> at Freenet.SendFailedException.(SendFailedException.java:9)
> at Freenet.Message.send
I started up a top of tree server and got a few of these:
java.lang.NullPointerException:
at Freenet.SendFailedException.(SendFailedException.java:9)
at Freenet.Message.sendBack(Message.java:278)
at Freenet.message.InsertReply.pReceived(InsertReply.java:33)
at Free
Paul writes:
> java.lang.NullPointerException:
> at Freenet.SendFailedException.(SendFailedException.java:9)
> at Freenet.Message.sendBack(Message.java:278)
> at Freenet.message.InsertReply.pReceived(InsertReply.java:33)
> at Freenet.Message.received(Message.java:166
