On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 20:23, Brandon Low wrote:
On Fri, 09/26/03 at 00:52:18 +0100, Toad wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 06:24:14PM -0500, Brandon Low wrote:
Ok, I think I've nailed down all of the remaining locking issues which
were plaguing my node. Last time I dumped threads there was
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 05:17, Edward J. Huff wrote:
I claim it is helpful. The QThreadFactory locking reduces contention
for locks. It has a bug or two, which I have fixed.
Problem with killsurplusconnections was that while one thread is
killing a connection, the others wait. And none of
Hi,
Looks like something is not quite right in 6208. I am seeing _lots_ of
these errors (several per minute):
Sep 26, 2003 7:40:41 AM (freenet.Ticker, Ticker, ERROR): Failed to execute [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sep 26, 2003 7:40:41 AM (freenet.Ticker, Ticker, ERROR): Could not execute
Low
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] [PATCH] [JAR] More locking fixes (BIG ONE)
Hi,
Looks like something is not quite right in 6208. I am seeing
_lots_ of
these errors (several per minute):
Sep 26, 2003 7:40:41 AM (freenet.Ticker, Ticker, ERROR):
Needs
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Tomlinson
Sent: den 26 september 2003 13:03
To: Brandon Low
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] [PATCH] [JAR] More locking fixes (BIG ONE)
Hi,
Looks like something is not quite right in 6208. I am seeing
_lots_ of
these errors
Ok, I think I've nailed down all of the remaining locking issues which
were plaguing my node. Last time I dumped threads there was only 1 out
of over 200 that was waiting for a monitor. This is a pretty extreme
patch, as it moves KillSurplusConnections to a daemon thread, and
completely redoes
