[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-18 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 16 August 2009 21:36:17 NextGen$ wrote: > * xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: > > > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker? > > > Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to g

[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-18 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:35 PM, xor wrote: > On Monday 17 August 2009 16:33:53 Daniel Cheng wrote: [...] >> ? 4. some simple typos / ui glitches >> ? ? ? if you have time, fix these, it would be more helpful then >> messing with the bug tracker. >> ? ? ? most of them are just one line of patch. ?

Re: [freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-18 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 16 August 2009 21:36:17 NextGen$ wrote: > * xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: > > > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker? > > > Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to g

[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-17 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 17 August 2009 16:35:09 xor wrote: > On Monday 17 August 2009 16:33:53 Daniel Cheng wrote: > > Do you see the pattern? > > Many of the "bugs" are just enchancment/idea that come up on mail list / > > irc. Some of them don't even have an conclusion on wether we should > > implement them. A

[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-17 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 17 August 2009 16:19:20 Evan Daniel wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Daniel Cheng > wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:16 PM, xor wrote: > >> On Sunday 16 August 2009 22:36:17 NextGen$ wrote: > >>> * xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: > >>> > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGe

[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-17 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:16 PM, xor wrote: > On Sunday 16 August 2009 22:36:17 NextGen$ wrote: >> * xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: >> > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: >> > > Hi,Being another developer who have __tried__ to fix the issue tracker, I think I have to say something here

Re: [freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-17 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:35 PM, xor wrote: > On Monday 17 August 2009 16:33:53 Daniel Cheng wrote: [...] >>   4. some simple typos / ui glitches >>       if you have time, fix these, it would be more helpful then >> messing with the bug tracker. >>       most of them are just one line of patch.  

[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-17 Thread xor
On Monday 17 August 2009 16:33:53 Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:16 PM, xor wrote: > > On Sunday 16 August 2009 22:36:17 NextGen$ wrote: > >> * xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: > >> > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: > >> > > Hi,Being another developer who have __tried_

[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-17 Thread xor
On Sunday 16 August 2009 22:36:17 NextGen$ wrote: > * xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: > > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker? > > > Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to get

Re: [freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-17 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 17 August 2009 16:35:09 xor wrote: > On Monday 17 August 2009 16:33:53 Daniel Cheng wrote: > > Do you see the pattern? > > Many of the "bugs" are just enchancment/idea that come up on mail list / > > irc. Some of them don't even have an conclusion on wether we should > > implement them. A

Re: [freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-17 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 17 August 2009 16:19:20 Evan Daniel wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Daniel Cheng > wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:16 PM, xor wrote: > >> On Sunday 16 August 2009 22:36:17 NextGen$ wrote: > >>> * xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: > >>> > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGe

[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-17 Thread Evan Daniel
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:16 PM, xor wrote: >> On Sunday 16 August 2009 22:36:17 NextGen$ wrote: >>> * xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: >>> > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: >>> > > Hi,Being another developer who have __tried__ t

Re: [freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-17 Thread xor
On Monday 17 August 2009 16:33:53 Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:16 PM, xor wrote: > > On Sunday 16 August 2009 22:36:17 NextGen$ wrote: > >> * xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: > >> > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: > >> > > Hi,Being another developer who have __tried_

Re: [freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-17 Thread Evan Daniel
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:16 PM, xor wrote: >> On Sunday 16 August 2009 22:36:17 NextGen$ wrote: >>> * xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: >>> > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: >>> > > Hi,Being another developer who have __tried__ to

Re: [freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-17 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:16 PM, xor wrote: > On Sunday 16 August 2009 22:36:17 NextGen$ wrote: >> * xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: >> > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: >> > > Hi,Being another developer who have __tried__ to fix the issue tracker, I think I have to say something here

Re: [freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-17 Thread xor
On Sunday 16 August 2009 22:36:17 NextGen$ wrote: > * xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: > > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker? > > > Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to get

[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-16 Thread NextGen$
* xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: > > Hi, > > > > What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker? > > Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to get them > > implemented... and it is spamming our inboxes (I'm s

[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-16 Thread xor
On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: > Hi, > > What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker? > Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to get them > implemented... and it is spamming our inboxes (I'm still subscribed to > most, like most of us)

[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-16 Thread NextGen$
Hi, What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker? Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to get them implemented... and it is spamming our inboxes (I'm still subscribed to most, like most of us). Changing the priority of tickets you've no business with w

Re: [freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-16 Thread NextGen$
* xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: > > Hi, > > > > What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker? > > Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to get them > > implemented... and it is spamming our inboxes (I'm s

Re: [freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-16 Thread xor
On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: > Hi, > > What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker? > Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to get them > implemented... and it is spamming our inboxes (I'm still subscribed to > most, like most of us)

[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

2009-08-16 Thread NextGen$
Hi, What are you doing here? starting an edit-war on the bug tracker? Editing the priority/milestone of loads of tickets won't help to get them implemented... and it is spamming our inboxes (I'm still subscribed to most, like most of us). Changing the priority of tickets you've no business with w