-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|> I agree here. But giving an option to use existing account (perhaps
|> verifying its permissions, etc) is still a good idea. Also, asking to
|> remove existing accounts could be a good idea.
|
| That's not gonna happen... Removing things during the
* Victor Denisov [2008-03-18 14:59:50]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> |> I think that installer should at least ask if a dedicated user should be
> |> created, and an option to use an existing account. I have... what... 4
> |> freenet users now on my system (yeah, I've be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|> I think that installer should at least ask if a dedicated user should be
|> created, and an option to use an existing account. I have... what... 4
|> freenet users now on my system (yeah, I've been lazy to properly
|> uninstall freenet a couple of t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|> I agree here. But giving an option to use existing account (perhaps
|> verifying its permissions, etc) is still a good idea. Also, asking to
|> remove existing accounts could be a good idea.
|
| That's not gonna happen... Removing things during the
* Victor Denisov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-18 14:59:50]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> |> I think that installer should at least ask if a dedicated user should be
> |> created, and an option to use an existing account. I have... what... 4
> |> freenet users now on my sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|> I think that installer should at least ask if a dedicated user should be
|> created, and an option to use an existing account. I have... what... 4
|> freenet users now on my system (yeah, I've been lazy to properly
|> uninstall freenet a couple of t
* Victor Denisov [2008-03-17 22:59:50]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> | If it is standard practice for services to run as SYSTEM then we
> | should probably do that too. We don't need to be spending our time
> | and energy reinventing how to install software on Windows.
* Ian Clarke [2008-03-17 14:31:19]:
> If it is standard practice for services to run as SYSTEM then we
> should probably do that too. We don't need to be spending our time
> and energy reinventing how to install software on Windows.
>
> Ian.
That was my original view too but toad managed to co
* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-17 16:45:43]:
> How hard would it be to run Freenet as the user that installed it?
>
Not hard... but as explained on IRC it's not an option because the user
is unlikely to have the SeServiceLogonRight ... and we don't want to
give him for obvious security reasons.
>
* Robert Hailey [2008-03-17 15:11:38]:
>
> On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> > How hard would it be to run Freenet as the user that installed it?
>
> Or maybe there is a flag to make a user not login-able?
> --
> Robert Hailey
Why would you want the freenet user to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| If it is standard practice for services to run as SYSTEM then we
| should probably do that too. We don't need to be spending our time
| and energy reinventing how to install software on Windows.
I think that installer should at least ask if a dedic
* Victor Denisov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-17 22:59:50]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> | If it is standard practice for services to run as SYSTEM then we
> | should probably do that too. We don't need to be spending our time
> | and energy reinventing how to install so
* Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-17 14:31:19]:
> If it is standard practice for services to run as SYSTEM then we
> should probably do that too. We don't need to be spending our time
> and energy reinventing how to install software on Windows.
>
> Ian.
That was my original view too but
* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-17 16:45:43]:
> How hard would it be to run Freenet as the user that installed it?
>
Not hard... but as explained on IRC it's not an option because the user
is unlikely to have the SeServiceLogonRight ... and we don't want to
give him for obvious s
* Robert Hailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-17 15:11:38]:
>
> On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> > How hard would it be to run Freenet as the user that installed it?
>
> Or maybe there is a flag to make a user not login-able?
> --
> Robert Hailey
Why would you want the
How hard would it be to run Freenet as the user that installed it?
- toad at zceUWxlSaHLmvEMnbr4RHnVfehA - 2008.03.15 - 23:11:45GMT -
Clearly running as SYSTEM is bad. However every other service runs as SYSTEM,
if we just install a service to run Freenet, it will run as SYSTEM. We
On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> How hard would it be to run Freenet as the user that installed it?
Or maybe there is a flag to make a user not login-able?
--
Robert Hailey
>
>
> - toad at zceUWxlSaHLmvEMnbr4RHnVfehA - 2008.03.15 -
> 23:11:45GMT -
>
> Clear
If it is standard practice for services to run as SYSTEM then we
should probably do that too. We don't need to be spending our time
and energy reinventing how to install software on Windows.
Ian.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> How hard would it be to run Freenet as
On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> How hard would it be to run Freenet as the user that installed it?
Or maybe there is a flag to make a user not login-able?
--
Robert Hailey
>
>
> - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2008.03.15 -
> 23:11:45GMT -
>
> Clearly running as SYST
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| If it is standard practice for services to run as SYSTEM then we
| should probably do that too. We don't need to be spending our time
| and energy reinventing how to install software on Windows.
I think that installer should at least ask if a dedic
If it is standard practice for services to run as SYSTEM then we
should probably do that too. We don't need to be spending our time
and energy reinventing how to install software on Windows.
Ian.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Matthew Toseland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How hard would it be
How hard would it be to run Freenet as the user that installed it?
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2008.03.15 - 23:11:45GMT -
Clearly running as SYSTEM is bad. However every other service runs as SYSTEM,
if we just install a service to run Freenet, it will run as SYSTEM. We
decided this is ba
22 matches
Mail list logo
