On Wednesday 22 April 2009 20:48:10 guido wrote:
> Am Wednesday 22 April 2009 18:26:05 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > After a long conversation with p0s, I am fairly sure that our decision at
> > last year's summit to use non-convergent encryption for splitfiles (i.e. a
> > different set of blocks e
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 20:48:10 guido wrote:
> Am Wednesday 22 April 2009 18:26:05 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > After a long conversation with p0s, I am fairly sure that our decision at
> > last year's summit to use non-convergent encryption for splitfiles (i.e. a
> > different set of blocks e
Am Wednesday 22 April 2009 18:26:05 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> After a long conversation with p0s, I am fairly sure that our decision at
> last year's summit to use non-convergent encryption for splitfiles (i.e. a
> different set of blocks each time) in order to largely solve our security
> proble
Am Wednesday 22 April 2009 18:26:05 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> After a long conversation with p0s, I am fairly sure that our decision at
> last year's summit to use non-convergent encryption for splitfiles (i.e. a
> different set of blocks each time) in order to largely solve our security
> proble
