[freenet-dev] FCP Spec issues

2006-05-08 Thread Florent Daignière (NextGen$)
* Matthew Toseland [2006-05-08 20:16:07]: > On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 10:39:21AM +0200, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > > * David McNab [2006-05-07 12:16:17]: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I've hacked a bit at the FCP v2 spec: > > > > > > * changed all instances of 'End' to 'EndMessage'

[freenet-dev] FCP Spec issues

2006-05-08 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 10:39:21AM +0200, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > * David McNab [2006-05-07 12:16:17]: > > > Hi all, > > > > I've hacked a bit at the FCP v2 spec: > > > > * changed all instances of 'End' to 'EndMessage' (pray that the Java > >FCP code is actually sending 'End

[freenet-dev] FCP Spec issues

2006-05-08 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 12:16:17PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > Hi all, > > I've hacked a bit at the FCP v2 spec: > > * changed all instances of 'End' to 'EndMessage' (pray that the Java >FCP code is actually sending 'EndMessage' and not 'End' It does. It doesn't matter what the client sends

Re: [freenet-dev] FCP Spec issues

2006-05-08 Thread NextGen$
* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-08 20:16:07]: > On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 10:39:21AM +0200, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > > * David McNab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-07 12:16:17]: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I've hacked a bit at the FCP v2 spec: > > > > > > * changed a

Re: [freenet-dev] FCP Spec issues

2006-05-08 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 10:39:21AM +0200, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > * David McNab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-07 12:16:17]: > > > Hi all, > > > > I've hacked a bit at the FCP v2 spec: > > > > * changed all instances of 'End' to 'EndMessage' (pray that the Java > >FCP code is ac

Re: [freenet-dev] FCP Spec issues

2006-05-08 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 12:16:17PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > Hi all, > > I've hacked a bit at the FCP v2 spec: > > * changed all instances of 'End' to 'EndMessage' (pray that the Java >FCP code is actually sending 'EndMessage' and not 'End' It does. It doesn't matter what the client sends

[freenet-dev] FCP Spec issues

2006-05-07 Thread David McNab
Hi all, I've hacked a bit at the FCP v2 spec: * changed all instances of 'End' to 'EndMessage' (pray that the Java FCP code is actually sending 'EndMessage' and not 'End' * sprinkled a bunch of TODO lines throughout, asking for clarifications in certain areas Also, BTW, I'm in the proce

[freenet-dev] FCP Spec issues

2006-05-07 Thread Florent Daignière (NextGen$)
* David McNab [2006-05-07 12:16:17]: > Hi all, > > I've hacked a bit at the FCP v2 spec: > > * changed all instances of 'End' to 'EndMessage' (pray that the Java >FCP code is actually sending 'EndMessage' and not 'End' > Would someone mind if I change the spec ? Letting only one type of

Re: [freenet-dev] FCP Spec issues

2006-05-07 Thread NextGen$
* David McNab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-07 12:16:17]: > Hi all, > > I've hacked a bit at the FCP v2 spec: > > * changed all instances of 'End' to 'EndMessage' (pray that the Java >FCP code is actually sending 'EndMessage' and not 'End' > Would someone mind if I change the spec ? Letti

[freenet-dev] FCP Spec issues

2006-05-06 Thread David McNab
Hi all, I've hacked a bit at the FCP v2 spec: * changed all instances of 'End' to 'EndMessage' (pray that the Java FCP code is actually sending 'EndMessage' and not 'End' * sprinkled a bunch of TODO lines throughout, asking for clarifications in certain areas Also, BTW, I'm in the proce