Just spotted an interesting message on Frost that I though might be of
interest to those on this list.
Simon
I just noticed that the Status for X in the Routing Table Status in
Node Status Interface in the Web Interface contains an estimator for the
node X's probability of DNF (pDNF) as a
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 06:54, Toad wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 12:41:46PM +0100, Simon Porter wrote:
I see five possible ways to solve the problem:
1) Everyone stops using Frost - obvious, but unlikely and wouldn't really
solve the problem (weakness in Freenet), just cut the
Quoting Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We have a mechanism called probability of legitimate DNF, which should
compensate for most of this noise.
Most (if not all) the time, probability of legitimate DNF is the same as
probability of DNF on my node.
j.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:52:58AM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 06:54, Toad wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 12:41:46PM +0100, Simon Porter wrote:
I see five possible ways to solve the problem:
1) Everyone stops using Frost - obvious, but unlikely and wouldn't
J wrote:
Quoting Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We have a mechanism called probability of legitimate DNF, which should
compensate for most of this noise.
Most (if not all) the time, probability of legitimate DNF is the same as
probability of DNF on my node.
I would think that's the effect the
