[freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-14 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:40:35PM -0500, misty- at charter.net wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 10:25:46PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 12:16:56PM -, Simon Porter wrote: > > >Is anyone actually going to fix build 544? I don't mean to moan on > > >about it but

[freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-14 Thread Todd Walton
At 07:40 PM 1/13/03, you wrote: >Just a FYI here, but build 650 is *also* experiencing this very same >bug. I'm getting tired of running broken nodes. > >Tim McGrath I'd just like to add here that I seem to have no problems with broken nodes (in general). For a project still in development, and

[freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-14 Thread GeckoX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I would suggest that people always keep previous versions of freenet's executables to prevent problems like this. When I upgrade, I always backup the old .jar files (and rename them with the build number). Then when I get a bad build like 544, I

[freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-14 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 09:16:43PM -0500, Andrew Rodland wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sunday 12 January 2003 08:22 pm, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > misty- at charter.net (misty- at charter.net) wrote: > > > The 'fixed' build 543 IS 544. 544 is ALSO broken. It'd be

Re: [freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-14 Thread GeckoX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I would suggest that people always keep previous versions of freenet's executables to prevent problems like this. When I upgrade, I always backup the old .jar files (and rename them with the build number). Then when I get a bad build like 544, I

Re: [freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-14 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:40:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 10:25:46PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 12:16:56PM -, Simon Porter wrote: Is anyone actually going to fix build 544? I don't mean to moan on about it but it's kind of

Re: [freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-14 Thread Todd Walton
At 07:40 PM 1/13/03, you wrote: Just a FYI here, but build 650 is *also* experiencing this very same bug. I'm getting tired of running broken nodes. Tim McGrath I'd just like to add here that I seem to have no problems with broken nodes (in general). For a project still in development, and

[freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-13 Thread mis...@charter.net
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 06:06:00PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > > WE CANT ITS SOURCEFORGE'S FAULT IT WORKS FINE HERE > > Is it ok now? Oddly enough, I just updated build 650 and it's working properly at rendering now. ... Maybe you should increment the build number just so people figure out they

[freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-13 Thread mis...@charter.net
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 10:25:46PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 12:16:56PM -, Simon Porter wrote: > >Is anyone actually going to fix build 544? I don't mean to moan on > >about it but it's kind of annoying for new and old users alike. Most > >annoying is that

[freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-13 Thread Ian Clarke
> WE CANT ITS SOURCEFORGE'S FAULT IT WORKS FINE HERE Is it ok now? Ian. -- Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://locut.us/ Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/

[freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-13 Thread b...@cbfmail.com
Hmm So much for stable builds, this issue should have been resolved already. Serves me right for keeping my nodes up to date! >Ahh, so they'll get an accurate first impression ^_^ > >(relax guys, it's a joke :-p) > >- fish Powered by CBFMail http://www.cbfmail.com

Re: [freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-13 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 09:16:43PM -0500, Andrew Rodland wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 12 January 2003 08:22 pm, Greg Wooledge wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: The 'fixed' build 543 IS 544. 544 is ALSO broken. It'd be nice if someone

Re: [freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-13 Thread Ian Clarke
WE CANT ITS SOURCEFORGE'S FAULT IT WORKS FINE HERE Is it ok now? Ian. -- Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://locut.us/ Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/

Re: [freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-13 Thread misty-
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 10:25:46PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 12:16:56PM -, Simon Porter wrote: Is anyone actually going to fix build 544? I don't mean to moan on about it but it's kind of annoying for new and old users alike. Most annoying is that its

Re: [freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-13 Thread misty-
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 06:06:00PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: WE CANT ITS SOURCEFORGE'S FAULT IT WORKS FINE HERE Is it ok now? Oddly enough, I just updated build 650 and it's working properly at rendering now. ... Maybe you should increment the build number just so people figure out they

[freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-12 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: > Hmm > > So much for stable builds, this issue should have been resolved already. Serves me right for keeping my nodes up to date! If you want a good 543 build, http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-543.jar should be up. -Mathew

[freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-12 Thread Ian Clarke
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 12:16:56PM -, Simon Porter wrote: >Is anyone actually going to fix build 544? I don't mean to moan on >about it but it's kind of annoying for new and old users alike. Most >annoying is that its stripping out tags. This doesn't >seem to be an issue

[freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-12 Thread Andrew Rodland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 12 January 2003 08:22 pm, Greg Wooledge wrote: > misty- at charter.net (misty- at charter.net) wrote: > > The 'fixed' build 543 IS 544. 544 is ALSO broken. It'd be nice if > > someone seriously took at look at this problem. > > For whatever

[freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-12 Thread Greg Wooledge
misty- at charter.net (misty- at charter.net) wrote: > The 'fixed' build 543 IS 544. 544 is ALSO broken. It'd be nice if > someone seriously took at look at this problem. For whatever it's worth, I'm not seeing this problem with the node that I compiled myself from CVS. I built it using ant and

[freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-12 Thread mis...@charter.net
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 02:05:42PM +0100, Frank v Waveren wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 12:16:56PM -, Simon Porter wrote: > > Is anyone actually going to fix build 544? I don't mean to moan on about > > it but it's kind of annoying for new and old users alike. Most annoying > > is that its

[freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-12 Thread Simon Porter
Is anyone actually going to fix build 544? I dont mean to moan on about it but its kind of annoying for new and old users alike. Most annoying is that its stripping out a ... /a tags. This doesnt seem to be an issue running the later build 650. Thanks. Simon

Re: [freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-12 Thread Frank v Waveren
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 12:16:56PM -, Simon Porter wrote: Is anyone actually going to fix build 544? I don't mean to moan on about it but it's kind of annoying for new and old users alike. Most annoying is that its stripping out a ... /a tags. This doesn't seem to be an issue running the

Re: [freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-12 Thread misty-
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 02:05:42PM +0100, Frank v Waveren wrote: On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 12:16:56PM -, Simon Porter wrote: Is anyone actually going to fix build 544? I don't mean to moan on about it but it's kind of annoying for new and old users alike. Most annoying is that its

Re: [freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-12 Thread Greg Wooledge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: The 'fixed' build 543 IS 544. 544 is ALSO broken. It'd be nice if someone seriously took at look at this problem. For whatever it's worth, I'm not seeing this problem with the node that I compiled myself from CVS. I built it using ant and jikes.

Re: [freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-12 Thread Andrew Rodland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 12 January 2003 08:22 pm, Greg Wooledge wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: The 'fixed' build 543 IS 544. 544 is ALSO broken. It'd be nice if someone seriously took at look at this problem. For whatever it's worth, I'm

Re: [freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-12 Thread fish
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 09:16:43PM -0500, Andrew Rodland wrote: But in any case, it is definitely COMPLETELY BROKEN. ONE HUNDRED PERCENT NOT WORKING, in the snapshots on freenetproject.org and you should FIX THEM RIGHT NOW, developers, unless you want everyone to think that you're COMPLETE

Re: [freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?

2003-01-12 Thread ben
Hmm So much for stable builds, this issue should have been resolved already. Serves me right for keeping my nodes up to date! Ahh, so they'll get an accurate first impression ^_^ (relax guys, it's a joke :-p) - fish Powered by CBFMail http://www.cbfmail.com