[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-11 Thread Guido Winkelmann
Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 17:20:10 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > On Friday 11 April 2008 16:00, Guido Winkelmann wrote: > > Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 15:19:57 schrieb Guido Winkelmann: > > > > I spoke too early. The wrapper.log looks like this now (see attachment). > > > > It looks like if this con

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 11 April 2008 17:18, Guido Winkelmann wrote: > Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 17:20:10 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > On Friday 11 April 2008 16:00, Guido Winkelmann wrote: > > > Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 15:19:57 schrieb Guido Winkelmann: > > > > > > I spoke too early. The wrapper.log looks

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-11 Thread Guido Winkelmann
Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 15:19:57 schrieb Guido Winkelmann: > Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 04:18:01 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > > It's rebuilding the database and it would take some time for large > > datastore. Do you have still any error message _before_ theses lines? > > The earliest messages in the

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 11 April 2008 16:00, Guido Winkelmann wrote: > Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 15:19:57 schrieb Guido Winkelmann: > > Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 04:18:01 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > > > It's rebuilding the database and it would take some time for large > > > datastore. Do you have still any error

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-11 Thread Guido Winkelmann
Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 04:18:01 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:07 AM, guido wrote: > > After one of these updates (probably 1135), my node has restarted. That > > was yesterday at about 7 am, but I can't say for sure, because the point > > when this happened is no longer in

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-11 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:07 AM, guido wrote: > After one of these updates (probably 1135), my node has restarted. That was > yesterday at about 7 am, but I can't say for sure, because the point when > this happened is no longer in the logs. It's close to 24 hours later now, and > it still has

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 11 April 2008 17:18, Guido Winkelmann wrote: > Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 17:20:10 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > On Friday 11 April 2008 16:00, Guido Winkelmann wrote: > > > Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 15:19:57 schrieb Guido Winkelmann: > > > > > > I spoke too early. The wrapper.log looks

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-11 Thread Guido Winkelmann
Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 17:20:10 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > On Friday 11 April 2008 16:00, Guido Winkelmann wrote: > > Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 15:19:57 schrieb Guido Winkelmann: > > > > I spoke too early. The wrapper.log looks like this now (see attachment). > > > > It looks like if this con

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 11 April 2008 16:00, Guido Winkelmann wrote: > Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 15:19:57 schrieb Guido Winkelmann: > > Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 04:18:01 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > > > It's rebuilding the database and it would take some time for large > > > datastore. Do you have still any error

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-11 Thread Guido Winkelmann
Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 15:19:57 schrieb Guido Winkelmann: > Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 04:18:01 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > > It's rebuilding the database and it would take some time for large > > datastore. Do you have still any error message _before_ theses lines? > > The earliest messages in the

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-11 Thread Guido Winkelmann
Am Freitag, 11. April 2008 04:18:01 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:07 AM, guido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > After one of these updates (probably 1135), my node has restarted. That > > was yesterday at about 7 am, but I can't say for sure, because the point > > when this happe

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-11 Thread guido
After one of these updates (probably 1135), my node has restarted. That was yesterday at about 7 am, but I can't say for sure, because the point when this happened is no longer in the logs. It's close to 24 hours later now, and it still hasn't finished restarting. The wrapper.log is full with l

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-10 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:07 AM, guido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After one of these updates (probably 1135), my node has restarted. That was > yesterday at about 7 am, but I can't say for sure, because the point when > this happened is no longer in the logs. It's close to 24 hours later now,

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-10 Thread guido
After one of these updates (probably 1135), my node has restarted. That was yesterday at about 7 am, but I can't say for sure, because the point when this happened is no longer in the logs. It's close to 24 hours later now, and it still hasn't finished restarting. The wrapper.log is full with l

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-10 Thread Matthew Toseland
1137 just has an extra check to make sure the segfault doesn't happen even in the case of a corrupt or malicious splitfile. Upgrade! On Thursday 10 April 2008 16:50, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Freenet 0.7 build 1136 is now available. Please upgrade. I forgot to announce > 1135; a big part of 113

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-10 Thread Matthew Toseland
Freenet 0.7 build 1136 is now available. Please upgrade. I forgot to announce 1135; a big part of 1136 is fixing bugs in 1135. Apologies for the recent node crashes... Changes: 1135: - Increase the redundancy on splitfiles from 150% to 200%. Your node only needs to download 100% of this to compl

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-10 Thread Matthew Toseland
1137 just has an extra check to make sure the segfault doesn't happen even in the case of a corrupt or malicious splitfile. Upgrade! On Thursday 10 April 2008 16:50, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Freenet 0.7 build 1136 is now available. Please upgrade. I forgot to announce > 1135; a big part of 113

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1135 and 1136

2008-04-10 Thread Matthew Toseland
Freenet 0.7 build 1136 is now available. Please upgrade. I forgot to announce 1135; a big part of 1136 is fixing bugs in 1135. Apologies for the recent node crashes... Changes: 1135: - Increase the redundancy on splitfiles from 150% to 200%. Your node only needs to download 100% of this to compl