Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet and Tor combination

2013-05-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 23 May 2013 17:36:07 Zwiebelcode wrote: > > Am 23.05.2013 14:21, schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > > > Connecting to our direct peers over Tor would be total madness. It > would significantly reduce performance for zero actual benefit. And it > would be just as easy to block as Tor is, i.e

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet and Tor combination

2013-05-23 Thread Zwiebelcode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 23.05.2013 14:21, schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > Connecting to our direct peers over Tor would be total madness. It would significantly reduce performance for zero actual benefit. And it would be just as easy to block as Tor is, i.e. very. yes. woul

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet and Tor combination

2013-05-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 22 May 2013 23:06:35 Zwiebelcode wrote: > Hi developers, > > i read on this mailinglist, that maybe tunneling is a feature that will > be realized next (If i understood that correctly). If freenet goes in > the direction of tunneling, would it make sense to combine freenet with > anot

[freenet-dev] Freenet and Tor combination

2013-05-22 Thread Zwiebelcode
Hi developers, i read on this mailinglist, that maybe tunneling is a feature that will be realized next (If i understood that correctly). If freenet goes in the direction of tunneling, would it make sense to combine freenet with another technologies like tor or i2p? i2p is java and there is also a