[freenet-dev] GSoC 2012 Transport Plugin

2012-04-05 Thread Chetan Hosmani
Thank you so much toad. Its very detailed and I ll need to go through it thoroughly. Also I am not sure this is relevant, but I did get a mail from a "stranger" who happened to be going through the archives and decided to send me an opinion. I thought it's best if we discussed here. I requested

[freenet-dev] GSoC 2012 Transport Plugin

2012-04-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 05 Apr 2012 14:29:12 Chetan Hosmani wrote: > Thank you so much toad. Its very detailed and I ll need to go through > it thoroughly. > > Also I am not sure this is relevant, but I did get a mail from a > "stranger" who happened to be going through the archives and decided > to send me

[freenet-dev] GSoC 2012 Transport Plugin

2012-04-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 04 Apr 2012 07:15:26 Chetan Hosmani wrote: > Hello, > > With only three days left for the deadline of submission of proposals > I was hoping I could get some suggestions on my proposal. > This is my only proposal. I am also working on another proposal to > Freenet itself

Re: [freenet-dev] GSoC 2012 Transport Plugin

2012-04-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 04 Apr 2012 07:15:26 Chetan Hosmani wrote: Hello, With only three days left for the deadline of submission of proposals I was hoping I could get some suggestions on my proposal. This is my only proposal. I am also working on another proposal to Freenet itself (implementing

Re: [freenet-dev] GSoC 2012 Transport Plugin

2012-04-05 Thread Chetan Hosmani
Thank you so much toad. Its very detailed and I ll need to go through it thoroughly. Also I am not sure this is relevant, but I did get a mail from a stranger who happened to be going through the archives and decided to send me an opinion. I thought it's best if we discussed here. I requested the

Re: [freenet-dev] GSoC 2012 Transport Plugin

2012-04-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 05 Apr 2012 14:29:12 Chetan Hosmani wrote: Thank you so much toad. Its very detailed and I ll need to go through it thoroughly. Also I am not sure this is relevant, but I did get a mail from a stranger who happened to be going through the archives and decided to send me an

[freenet-dev] GSoC 2012 Transport Plugin

2012-04-04 Thread Chetan Hosmani
Hello, With only three days left for the deadline of submission of proposals I was hoping I could get some suggestions on my proposal. This is my only proposal. I am also working on another proposal to Freenet itself (implementing JCA). Any suggestions will be really helpful. The proposal can

[freenet-dev] GSoC 2012 Transport Plugin

2012-04-04 Thread Chetan Hosmani
Hello, With only three days left for the deadline of submission of proposals I was hoping I could get some suggestions on my proposal. This is my only proposal. I am also working on another proposal to Freenet itself (implementing JCA). Any suggestions will be really helpful. The proposal can

[freenet-dev] GSOC 2012 Transport Plugin (Task on JCA)

2012-04-03 Thread Chetan Hosmani
Okay I ll read about what JCA uses. JCA actually supports several variations and algorithms. Yes I have a node running that connects to similar new nodes using negtype = 8 (which is JCA) and it also connects to old nodes using the previous negotiation types. On the surface it runs exactly the way

[freenet-dev] GSOC 2012 Transport Plugin (Task on JCA)

2012-04-03 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 01 Apr 2012 19:48:43 Chetan Hosmani wrote: > Hello, > > As an expected task for GSOC (discussed on IRC) I worked on the JCA > implementation for encryption. > Here is what I have done- > > 1. Created JCACipher implements Block Cipher. > 2. Added negtype = 8 > 3. For negtype = 8 use new

[freenet-dev] GSOC 2012 Transport Plugin (Task on JCA)

2012-04-02 Thread Chetan Hosmani
Hello, As an expected task for GSOC (discussed on IRC) I worked on the JCA implementation for encryption. Here is what I have done- 1. Created JCACipher implements Block Cipher. 2. Added negtype = 8 3. For negtype = 8 use new JCACipher object instead of new Rijndael object 4. Changed other

Re: [freenet-dev] GSOC 2012 Transport Plugin (Task on JCA)

2012-04-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 01 Apr 2012 19:48:43 Chetan Hosmani wrote: Hello, As an expected task for GSOC (discussed on IRC) I worked on the JCA implementation for encryption. Here is what I have done- 1. Created JCACipher implements Block Cipher. 2. Added negtype = 8 3. For negtype = 8 use new

Re: [freenet-dev] GSOC 2012 Transport Plugin (Task on JCA)

2012-04-02 Thread Chetan Hosmani
Okay I ll read about what JCA uses. JCA actually supports several variations and algorithms. Yes I have a node running that connects to similar new nodes using negtype = 8 (which is JCA) and it also connects to old nodes using the previous negotiation types. On the surface it runs exactly the way

[freenet-dev] GSOC 2012 Transport Plugin (Task on JCA)

2012-04-01 Thread Chetan Hosmani
Hello, As an expected task for GSOC (discussed on IRC) I worked on the JCA implementation for encryption. Here is what I have done- 1. Created JCACipher implements Block Cipher. 2. Added negtype = 8 3. For negtype = 8 use new JCACipher object instead of new Rijndael object 4. Changed other