On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:21:12AM -0500, Ken Corson wrote:
are we still steadfastly opposed to limiting the number of active
trailers between a pair of peers ? It is just another option, is
all. It is hard to represent, when they all have different start
and end times... but if the effective
Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On November 18, 2003 10:06 pm, Toad wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:55:54PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On November 18, 2003 09:48 pm, Toad wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:47:03PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On November 18, 2003 05:29 pm, Toad wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at
Hi,
Ed Tomlinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 2003-11-19:
Problem is that all the flies can enter the swamp but they can only leave
through a couple small tubes. The flies breed and the frogs and fish cannot
eat them fast enough so lots of them queue at the exit tubes.
I don't quite get the
On a related note, I'm thinking of moving the node to a DSL
uplink for the rest of the month (I've only got 20GB to waste
per month on the DSL link, and that takes my node about 10
days). Does anyone care to predict whether it will adjust to
the new situation quickly enough for the speed
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 02:22:26PM +0100, Thomas Themel wrote:
Hi,
Ed Tomlinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 2003-11-19:
Problem is that all the flies can enter the swamp but they can only leave
through a couple small tubes. The flies breed and the frogs and fish cannot
eat them fast
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 08:22, Thomas Themel wrote:
| Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 299 (199/100/2048)
| Connections transferring (Transmitting/Receiving) 40 (12/28)
| Data waiting to be transfered 42 MiB
| Total amount of data
Hi,
my node is currently running off an ISDN link, and it seems to build up
pretty high values in the connection manager's 'Data waiting to be
transfered' counter. It's constantly around 30MiB, and that's more than the
link can do in an hour under optimal conditions - I don't believe this
makes
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 11:00:27PM +0100, Thomas Themel wrote:
Hi,
my node is currently running off an ISDN link, and it seems to build up
pretty high values in the connection manager's 'Data waiting to be
transfered' counter. It's constantly around 30MiB, and that's more than the
link can
On November 18, 2003 05:00 pm, Thomas Themel wrote:
Hi,
my node is currently running off an ISDN link, and it seems to build up
pretty high values in the connection manager's 'Data waiting to be
transfered' counter. It's constantly around 30MiB, and that's more than the
link can do in an
On November 18, 2003 05:29 pm, Toad wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 11:00:27PM +0100, Thomas Themel wrote:
Hi,
my node is currently running off an ISDN link, and it seems to build up
pretty high values in the connection manager's 'Data waiting to be
transfered' counter. It's constantly
On November 18, 2003 09:48 pm, Toad wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:47:03PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On November 18, 2003 05:29 pm, Toad wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 11:00:27PM +0100, Thomas Themel wrote:
Hi,
my node is currently running off an ISDN link, and it seems to
On November 18, 2003 10:06 pm, Toad wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:55:54PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On November 18, 2003 09:48 pm, Toad wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:47:03PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On November 18, 2003 05:29 pm, Toad wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at
No. As I said, NGRouting will be able to fix it. Look at your
successTransferRate for the days when it was disabled.
4K-6K per second... With a sendData value of bwtween .13-.29
So its still not doing that well. Mind you, you did fix a bug that
might just help this...
Maybe (just
13 matches
Mail list logo
