[freenet-dev] License on wiki documentation

2010-04-09 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 09 April 2010 07:12:50 Florent Daigniere wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 04:02:56PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Tuesday 06 April 2010 15:16:14 Ximin Luo wrote: > > > On 04/06/2010 02:41 PM, cvollet at gmail.com wrote: > > > > Le 6 avr. 2010 15:21, Ximin Luo a ?crit : > > > >>

Re: [freenet-dev] License on wiki documentation

2010-04-09 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 09 April 2010 07:12:50 Florent Daigniere wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 04:02:56PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Tuesday 06 April 2010 15:16:14 Ximin Luo wrote: > > > On 04/06/2010 02:41 PM, cvol...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > Le 6 avr. 2010 15:21, Ximin Luo a écrit : > > > >> atm

[freenet-dev] License on wiki documentation

2010-04-09 Thread Florent Daigniere
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 04:02:56PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tuesday 06 April 2010 15:16:14 Ximin Luo wrote: > > On 04/06/2010 02:41 PM, cvollet at gmail.com wrote: > > > Le 6 avr. 2010 15:21, Ximin Luo a ?crit : > > >> atm the wiki content is licensed with GFDL. Do we want to relicense

Re: [freenet-dev] License on wiki documentation

2010-04-08 Thread Florent Daigniere
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 04:02:56PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tuesday 06 April 2010 15:16:14 Ximin Luo wrote: > > On 04/06/2010 02:41 PM, cvol...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Le 6 avr. 2010 15:21, Ximin Luo a écrit : > > >> atm the wiki content is licensed with GFDL. Do we want to relicense it

[freenet-dev] License on wiki documentation

2010-04-08 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 06 April 2010 15:16:14 Ximin Luo wrote: > On 04/06/2010 02:41 PM, cvollet at gmail.com wrote: > > Le 6 avr. 2010 15:21, Ximin Luo a ?crit : > >> atm the wiki content is licensed with GFDL. Do we want to relicense it as > >> CC-BY-SA (attribution+sharealike) instead? If so, we should do

Re: [freenet-dev] License on wiki documentation

2010-04-08 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 06 April 2010 15:16:14 Ximin Luo wrote: > On 04/06/2010 02:41 PM, cvol...@gmail.com wrote: > > Le 6 avr. 2010 15:21, Ximin Luo a écrit : > >> atm the wiki content is licensed with GFDL. Do we want to relicense it as > >> CC-BY-SA (attribution+sharealike) instead? If so, we should do thi

[freenet-dev] License on wiki documentation

2010-04-06 Thread Ximin Luo
On 04/06/2010 02:41 PM, cvollet at gmail.com wrote: > Le 6 avr. 2010 15:21, Ximin Luo a ?crit : >> atm the wiki content is licensed with GFDL. Do we want to relicense it as >> CC-BY-SA (attribution+sharealike) instead? If so, we should do this >> while the wiki is still young. > > What are the ad

[freenet-dev] License on wiki documentation

2010-04-06 Thread Ximin Luo
atm the wiki content is licensed with GFDL. Do we want to relicense it as CC-BY-SA (attribution+sharealike) instead? If so, we should do this while the wiki is still young. X

[freenet-dev] License on wiki documentation

2010-04-06 Thread Evan Daniel
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: > atm the wiki content is licensed with GFDL. Do we want to relicense it as > CC-BY-SA (attribution+sharealike) instead? If so, we should do this while the > wiki is still young. Yes, we do. Evan Daniel

Re: [freenet-dev] License on wiki documentation

2010-04-06 Thread Ximin Luo
On 04/06/2010 02:41 PM, cvol...@gmail.com wrote: > Le 6 avr. 2010 15:21, Ximin Luo a écrit : >> atm the wiki content is licensed with GFDL. Do we want to relicense it as >> CC-BY-SA (attribution+sharealike) instead? If so, we should do this >> while the wiki is still young. > > What are the advan

Re: [freenet-dev] License on wiki documentation

2010-04-06 Thread Evan Daniel
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: > atm the wiki content is licensed with GFDL. Do we want to relicense it as > CC-BY-SA (attribution+sharealike) instead? If so, we should do this while the > wiki is still young. Yes, we do. Evan Daniel

[freenet-dev] License on wiki documentation

2010-04-06 Thread Ximin Luo
atm the wiki content is licensed with GFDL. Do we want to relicense it as CC-BY-SA (attribution+sharealike) instead? If so, we should do this while the wiki is still young. X ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://osprey.vm.bytemark.co.uk/c