Matthew Toseland schrieb:
We should include JNA so we can use the patch to reduce Freenet's disk I/O
priority
on Windows. We can include this via auto-update as a separate jar.
However, the official
jar is apparently built via Maven. We could include the official jar
on the theory that
while
Hi toad,
do you mean something like that?
https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/How+To+Generate+PGP+Signatures+With+Maven
Right now, i think it's the only solution
voxsim
PS Sorry for my disappearance, I just finish yesterday everything for my
master degree =P
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at
We should include JNA so we can use the patch to reduce Freenet's disk I/O
priority on Windows. We can include this via auto-update as a separate jar.
However, the official jar is apparently built via Maven. We could include the
official jar on the theory that while Maven doesn't really meet
On Friday 26 Jul 2013 14:36:56 Simon Vocella wrote:
Hi toad,
do you mean something like that?
https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/How+To+Generate+PGP+Signatures+With+Maven
Right now, i think it's the only solution
Yikes.
So there's a reason that Maven doesn't verify signatures
