Re: [freenet-dev] Pitch Black Attack - Analysis, Code, Etc.

2013-01-31 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 31 Jan 2013 19:24:27 Michael Grube wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > > On Thursday 31 Jan 2013 16:16:38 Michael Grube wrote: > > > > > > > > > So how exactly do you use the 0.037 constant? > > > > > > > > If you don't have a peer with distance gre

Re: [freenet-dev] Pitch Black Attack - Analysis, Code, Etc.

2013-01-31 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 31 Jan 2013 16:16:38 Michael Grube wrote: > > > > > So how exactly do you use the 0.037 constant? > > > > If you don't have a peer with distance greater than 0.037 * (distance from > > random location to nearest node to the random location), then you reset? > > (This will break for node

[freenet-dev] Pitch Black Attack - Analysis, Code, Etc.

2013-01-31 Thread Michael Grube
Old response that was never forwarded. On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Hi Snark, > > Thank you for posting! Your analysis looks pretty good. > > Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013, 00:02:17 schrieb Michael Grube: > > > Not bad! There is obviously still some influence but

Re: [freenet-dev] Pitch Black Attack - Analysis, Code, Etc.

2013-01-31 Thread Michael Grube
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Monday 28 Jan 2013 21:39:54 Michael Grube wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Matthew Toseland < > t...@amphibian.dyndns.org > > > wrote: > > > > > On Monday 28 Jan 2013 18:09:07 Michael Grube wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 27, 201

Re: [freenet-dev] Pitch Black Attack - Analysis, Code, Etc.

2013-01-31 Thread Michael Grube
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Monday 28 Jan 2013 21:39:54 Michael Grube wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Matthew Toseland < > t...@amphibian.dyndns.org > > > wrote: > > > > > On Monday 28 Jan 2013 18:09:07 Michael Grube wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 27, 201

Re: [freenet-dev] Pitch Black Attack - Analysis, Code, Etc.

2013-01-28 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 28 Jan 2013 21:39:54 Michael Grube wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > > On Monday 28 Jan 2013 18:09:07 Michael Grube wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Matthew Toseland < > > > t...@amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sunday 27

Re: [freenet-dev] Pitch Black Attack - Analysis, Code, Etc.

2013-01-27 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 27 Jan 2013 14:06:08 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Hi Snark, > > Thank you for posting! Your analysis looks pretty good. > > Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013, 00:02:17 schrieb Michael Grube: > > > Not bad! There is obviously still some influence but the location > > distribution has evened

Re: [freenet-dev] Pitch Black Attack - Analysis, Code, Etc.

2013-01-27 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 27 Jan 2013 05:02:17 Michael Grube wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Around this time last year I started on work to simulate the pitch black > attack working against Oskar Sandberg's swapping algorithm that is > implemented for use with darknet. The work is essentially incomplete, but I > did e

Re: [freenet-dev] Pitch Black Attack - Analysis, Code, Etc.

2013-01-27 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Hi Snark, Thank you for posting! Your analysis looks pretty good. Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013, 00:02:17 schrieb Michael Grube: > Not bad! There is obviously still some influence but the location > distribution has evened out noticeably. > > There is one down side to this solution, however, and t

[freenet-dev] Pitch Black Attack - Analysis, Code, Etc.

2013-01-26 Thread Michael Grube
Hi everyone, Around this time last year I started on work to simulate the pitch black attack working against Oskar Sandberg's swapping algorithm that is implemented for use with darknet. The work is essentially incomplete, but I did enough to get an idea of how well Oskar's proposed solution to th