* Matthew Toseland [2007-08-06 22:28:30]:
> FROM FROST:
>
> On Wednesday 01 August 2007 21:23, NextGen$ wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-26 20:01:34]:
> > > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > > > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > > > > I propose that darknet
On Monday 06 August 2007 22:28, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> FROM FROST:
>
> On Wednesday 01 August 2007 21:23, NextGen$ wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-26 20:01:34]:
> > > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > > > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > > > > I propose th
FROM FROST:
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 21:23, NextGen$ wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-26 20:01:34]:
> > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > > > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and
> > > > path
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 21:23, NextGen$ wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-26 20:01:34]:
> > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > > > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and
> > > > path folding mess
* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-06 22:28:30]:
> FROM FROST:
>
> On Wednesday 01 August 2007 21:23, NextGen$ wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-26 20:01:34]:
> > > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Monday 06 August 2007 22:28, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> FROM FROST:
>
> On Wednesday 01 August 2007 21:23, NextGen$ wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-26 20:01:34]:
> > > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-0
FROM FROST:
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 21:23, NextGen$ wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-26 20:01:34]:
> > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > > > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 21:23, NextGen$ wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-26 20:01:34]:
> > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > > > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward annou
* Matthew Toseland [2007-07-26 20:01:34]:
> On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and path
> > > folding messages (ConnectDestination etc), without including their own
>
* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-26 20:01:34]:
> On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and path
> > > folding messages (ConnectDestinati
I like it.
On 7/26/07, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 26 July 2007 20:01, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > > > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and
> > > > path f
I like it.
On 7/26/07, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 26 July 2007 20:01, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > > > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to fo
On Thursday 26 July 2007 20:01, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and
> > > path folding messages (ConnectDestination etc), without including
On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and path
> > folding messages (ConnectDestination etc), without including their own
> > noderefs.
> >
> > Any objections?
>
> _o/
> It's
On Thursday 26 July 2007 20:01, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and
> > > path folding messages (ConnectDestination etc)
On Thursday 26 July 2007 04:14, NextGen$ wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> > I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and path
> > folding messages (ConnectDestination etc), without including their own
> > noderefs.
> >
> > Any objectio
* Matthew Toseland [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and path
> folding messages (ConnectDestination etc), without including their own
> noderefs.
>
> Any objections?
_o/
It's a bad idea.
Be informed that my node wont behave that way...
* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 18:39:11]:
> I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and path
> folding messages (ConnectDestination etc), without including their own
> noderefs.
>
> Any objections?
_o/
It's a bad idea.
Be informed that my node wont
I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and path
folding messages (ConnectDestination etc), without including their own
noderefs.
Any objections?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signa
I propose that darknet nodes be allowed to forward announcements and path
folding messages (ConnectDestination etc), without including their own
noderefs.
Any objections?
pgpR8FaBLxBmQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenet
20 matches
Mail list logo