[freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-cvs] r8801 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

2006-05-20 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 07:03:05PM +0200, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > * freenetwork at web.de [2006-05-20 18:58:37]: > > > Why enforce giving an email address? > > > > We want a stable darknet topology : ensuring that you can reach your > neighbors (friends) helps. > > > Per darknet-

[freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-cvs] r8801 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

2006-05-20 Thread Florent Daignière (NextGen$)
* freenetwork at web.de [2006-05-20 18:58:37]: > Why enforce giving an email address? > We want a stable darknet topology : ensuring that you can reach your neighbors (friends) helps. > Per darknet-definition I know the people I connect to, and for sure I don't > want my email adress in the r

[freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-cvs] r8801 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

2006-05-20 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Why enforce giving an email address? Per darknet-definition I know the people I connect to, and for sure I don't want my email adress in the ref I exchange at #freenet-refs... >Author: nextgens >Date: 2006-05-20 16:21:38 + (Sat, 20 May 2006) >New Revision: 8801 > >Modified: > trunk/freene

[freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-cvs] r8801 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

2006-05-20 Thread Ed Tomlinson
Hi, This is a perception issue. Users have be conditioned against giving out email addresses. When then do so its just another place spammers can get to them... Forcing people top use an email address will keep users away from freenet. It does not matter if its 'risk free' - it will not be

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-cvs] r8801 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

2006-05-20 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 07:03:05PM +0200, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-20 18:58:37]: > > > Why enforce giving an email address? > > > > We want a stable darknet topology : ensuring that you can reach your > neighbors (friends) helps. > >

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-cvs] r8801 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

2006-05-20 Thread Ed Tomlinson
Hi, This is a perception issue. Users have be conditioned against giving out email addresses. When then do so its just another place spammers can get to them... Forcing people top use an email address will keep users away from freenet. It does not matter if its 'risk free' - it will not be

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-cvs] r8801 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

2006-05-20 Thread NextGen$
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-20 18:58:37]: > Why enforce giving an email address? > We want a stable darknet topology : ensuring that you can reach your neighbors (friends) helps. > Per darknet-definition I know the people I connect to, and for sure I don't > want my email

[freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-cvs] r8801 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node

2006-05-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why enforce giving an email address? Per darknet-definition I know the people I connect to, and for sure I don't want my email adress in the ref I exchange at #freenet-refs... >Author: nextgens >Date: 2006-05-20 16:21:38 + (Sat, 20 May 2006) >New Revision: 8801 > >Modified: > trunk/freene