Just because it is not easily quantizable DOES NOT mean there is no
error in it.
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 07:40:58AM -0500, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
>
> >We need to think about why NGR isn't benefiting from a similar
> >self-reenforcing effect. I don't think it is as simple as "its
> >estimates are
Ian Clarke wrote:
Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
The very idea of using a formula for making decisions about routing
has one major flaw and that is the innacuracy of the estimators.
Well, classic routing routes on the basis of the assumption that getting
data from a node means that it is a good place
>We need to think about why NGR isn't benefiting from a similar
>self-reenforcing effect. I don't think it is as simple as "its
>estimates aren't good enough", any more than it is valid to say that
>classic routing's routing decisions are perfect.
If we view classical routing as ngr with a single
Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
The very idea of using a formula for making decisions about routing has
one major flaw and that is the innacuracy of the estimators. Unless a
perfect estimator is developed which will give the exact value of a
given variable, any formula will produce humonguous margin of
