On Thursday 23 October 2003 09:12 pm, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> You mean like this?
>
> SSK PcUIAvD3Jm7ThsH9HWFrYxIGEw0PAgM,flaghATTIcmo6j3ic7qohg/SSK
> PcUIAvD3Jm7ThsH9HWFrYxIGEw0PAgM/DFI//
>
> " " = "@"
>
> Actually, it's in the process of updating again right now, so it may not be
> immediatel
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 06:46:24PM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote:
> Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
>
> >Damn, of all the times for my node to go belly-up, just as I was inserting
> >the site again. :-) Ah well, gave me a chance to upgrade before
> >restarting.
>
> Err... if you've upgraded to 62
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
Damn, of all the times for my node to go belly-up, just as I was inserting
the site again. :-) Ah well, gave me a chance to upgrade before
restarting.
Err... if you've upgraded to 6275, then you better downgrade again to
6274 or wait for Toad to fix the problem with
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:12:38PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 05:29:04PM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote:
> > Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> >
> > >On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 06:15:15PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> > >
> > >>I've been running a spider, collecting si
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 05:29:04PM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote:
> Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 06:15:15PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> >
> >>I've been running a spider, collecting site info and am now in the
> >>process of inserting a new index freesite. Nearl
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 06:15:15PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
I've been running a spider, collecting site info and am now in the process
of inserting a new index freesite. Nearly done.
Figured we could use an index site of what's actually available under the
uns
